Skip to content

Invertible p-Form Symmetries and Topological Defects

An invertible pp-form symmetry in dd spacetime dimensions is represented by topological operators on codimension-(p+1)(p+1) submanifolds. Their fusion realizes a group, their inverse is implemented by orientation reversal or the inverse label, and their action on a pp-dimensional charged operator is measured by linking. Topological deformability is not enough: if a defect has no inverse under fusion, it belongs to a noninvertible categorical symmetry rather than a pp-form symmetry group.

Required background. Defects on Stratified Spacetimes supplies composition and isotopy data. Higher-Form Symmetry from Operators and Linking supplies the physical symmetry operators. Support, Codimension, and Operator Data fixes the support dimension of extended operators. Helpful background. Higher-Form Currents, Charges, Backgrounds, and Ward Identities connects the defect action to conserved currents and backgrounds.

Let AA be an abelian group. For gAg\in A, write Ug(Mdp1)U_g(M^{d-p-1}) for a symmetry defect supported on a closed oriented submanifold of codimension p+1p+1. “Topological” means that correlation functions are unchanged under deformations of MM that do not cross charged insertions. Fusion on parallel supports satisfies

Ug(M)Uh(M)=Ug+h(M),U0(M)=1,Ug(M)1=Ug(M).U_g(M)U_h(M)=U_{g+h}(M), \qquad U_0(M)=\mathbf1, \qquad U_g(M)^{-1}=U_{-g}(M).

For p>0p>0, locality forces the group to be abelian: two defects may be exchanged in the transverse space without crossing a charged operator. Gaiotto, Kapustin, Seiberg, and Willett state the codimension, fusion, and linking formulation in Gaiotto et al. 2015, §3, printed pp. 7–11 (PDF).

A charged operator Wq(Cp)W_q(C^p) carries a character χqA^\chi_q\in\widehat A. If MM links CC once, moving the topological defect around the operator gives

Ug(M)Wq(C)=χq(g)Wq(C).U_g(M)W_q(C)=\chi_q(g)\,W_q(C).

For several components, the exponent is multiplied by the oriented linking number. This is a categorical action by invertible endomorphisms: fusion of UgU_g and UhU_h multiplies their characters, and the inverse defect produces the inverse phase.

A background field for a finite pp-form symmetry is a (p+1)(p+1)-cocycle, modulo higher gauge transformations. The cocycle condition is the network version of defect conservation: symmetry sheets may meet only at junctions whose labels sum to zero. For continuous symmetries one uses a (p+1)(p+1)-form connection, including its integral periods and global differential-cohomology data when those affect observables.

Consider a four-dimensional gauge theory with a ZN\mathbb Z_N electric one-form symmetry. Its topological operators are surfaces Um(Σ)U_m(\Sigma), mZNm\in\mathbb Z_N, and a Wilson line Wq(C)W_q(C) has center charge qZNq\in\mathbb Z_N. With unit linking,

Um(Σ)Wq(C)=exp ⁣(2πimqN)Wq(C),U_m(\Sigma)W_q(C) =\exp\!\left(\frac{2\pi i mq}{N}\right)W_q(C),

and for arbitrary disjoint supports the exponent is multiplied by Link(Σ,C)\operatorname{Link}(\Sigma,C). Fusion gives UmUn=Um+nU_mU_n=U_{m+n}, while UmU_{-m} is the inverse. The phase passes three independent checks: it is invariant under mm+Nm\mapsto m+N, it is multiplicative under fusion, and it becomes one for center-neutral lines.

Equivalently, couple the theory to a background two-form ZN\mathbb Z_N gauge field BB. A Wilson line of charge qq is not invariant under a one-form gauge transformation unless it is dressed by a surface or transforms by the corresponding character. This background-field formulation and the defect-linking formulation are equivalent only after charge normalization and global-form choices are matched; Gaiotto et al. 2015, §§3–4, printed pp. 7–18 (PDF) develops both and exhibits their anomaly and gauging consequences.

The exact first application is developed by Higher-Form Symmetry from Operators and Linking. The mathematical contribution here is the invertible defect action and its coherence. Whether the symmetry is broken, gauged, anomalous, or visible in a particular spectrum remains a physical question for that treatment.

An ordinary symmetry has p=0p=0: its topological defects have codimension one and act on local operators. A one-form symmetry has codimension-two defects and acts on lines. A higher group is not merely a product of groups at several form degrees; its junction law includes a Postnikov class that mixes the corresponding backgrounds. Finally, a noninvertible topological defect may fuse to a direct sum rather than to one defect label.

The decisive adversarial test is to propose a deformable surface DD with

DD1X.D\otimes D\cong\mathbf1\oplus X.

No object D1D^{-1} can satisfy DD11D\otimes D^{-1}\cong\mathbf1 if fusion dimensions are positive and X0X\ne0. Thus DD can still define a topological operator and a categorical action, but it cannot be an element of a one-form symmetry group. Calling it “group-like” would incorrectly erase its additional fusion channel.

Global geometry supplies another check. A symmetry surface that bounds a three-chain can be shrunk away only when the chain crosses no charged line and no background flux. On a manifold with torsion cycles, a flat background can have nontrivial holonomy even though its differential-form curvature vanishes. The correct charge is therefore a character of the global higher-form gauge field, not merely an integral of a locally defined form. This is why the gauge group’s global form and the allowed line lattice must accompany the linking phase.

For N=4N=4, determine which Wilson charges are invisible to the surface U2U_2.

Solution

The linking phase is e2πi(2q)/4=(1)qe^{2\pi i(2q)/4}=(-1)^q. It is one precisely for q=0,2q=0,2 modulo 44. The surface therefore detects the quotient of the charge group by its even subgroup, not every Z4\mathbb Z_4 charge.

  • Gaiotto, Davide, Anton Kapustin, Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. “Generalized Global Symmetries.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2015, no. 2 (2015): 172. DOI; Open PDF.
  • Kapustin, Anton, and Nathan Seiberg. “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, no. 4 (2014): 001. DOI; Open PDF.