Invertible p-Form Symmetries and Topological Defects
An invertible -form symmetry in spacetime dimensions is represented by topological operators on codimension- submanifolds. Their fusion realizes a group, their inverse is implemented by orientation reversal or the inverse label, and their action on a -dimensional charged operator is measured by linking. Topological deformability is not enough: if a defect has no inverse under fusion, it belongs to a noninvertible categorical symmetry rather than a -form symmetry group.
Required background. Defects on Stratified Spacetimes supplies composition and isotopy data. Higher-Form Symmetry from Operators and Linking supplies the physical symmetry operators. Support, Codimension, and Operator Data fixes the support dimension of extended operators. Helpful background. Higher-Form Currents, Charges, Backgrounds, and Ward Identities connects the defect action to conserved currents and backgrounds.
Topological representatives and group law
Section titled “Topological representatives and group law”Let be an abelian group. For , write for a symmetry defect supported on a closed oriented submanifold of codimension . “Topological” means that correlation functions are unchanged under deformations of that do not cross charged insertions. Fusion on parallel supports satisfies
For , locality forces the group to be abelian: two defects may be exchanged in the transverse space without crossing a charged operator. Gaiotto, Kapustin, Seiberg, and Willett state the codimension, fusion, and linking formulation in Gaiotto et al. 2015, §3, printed pp. 7–11 (PDF).
A charged operator carries a character . If links once, moving the topological defect around the operator gives
For several components, the exponent is multiplied by the oriented linking number. This is a categorical action by invertible endomorphisms: fusion of and multiplies their characters, and the inverse defect produces the inverse phase.
A background field for a finite -form symmetry is a -cocycle, modulo higher gauge transformations. The cocycle condition is the network version of defect conservation: symmetry sheets may meet only at junctions whose labels sum to zero. For continuous symmetries one uses a -form connection, including its integral periods and global differential-cohomology data when those affect observables.
Four-dimensional one-form example
Section titled “Four-dimensional one-form example”Consider a four-dimensional gauge theory with a electric one-form symmetry. Its topological operators are surfaces , , and a Wilson line has center charge . With unit linking,
and for arbitrary disjoint supports the exponent is multiplied by . Fusion gives , while is the inverse. The phase passes three independent checks: it is invariant under , it is multiplicative under fusion, and it becomes one for center-neutral lines.
Equivalently, couple the theory to a background two-form gauge field . A Wilson line of charge is not invariant under a one-form gauge transformation unless it is dressed by a surface or transforms by the corresponding character. This background-field formulation and the defect-linking formulation are equivalent only after charge normalization and global-form choices are matched; Gaiotto et al. 2015, §§3–4, printed pp. 7–18 (PDF) develops both and exhibits their anomaly and gauging consequences.
The exact first application is developed by Higher-Form Symmetry from Operators and Linking. The mathematical contribution here is the invertible defect action and its coherence. Whether the symmetry is broken, gauged, anomalous, or visible in a particular spectrum remains a physical question for that treatment.
Distinguishing nearby structures
Section titled “Distinguishing nearby structures”An ordinary symmetry has : its topological defects have codimension one and act on local operators. A one-form symmetry has codimension-two defects and acts on lines. A higher group is not merely a product of groups at several form degrees; its junction law includes a Postnikov class that mixes the corresponding backgrounds. Finally, a noninvertible topological defect may fuse to a direct sum rather than to one defect label.
The decisive adversarial test is to propose a deformable surface with
No object can satisfy if fusion dimensions are positive and . Thus can still define a topological operator and a categorical action, but it cannot be an element of a one-form symmetry group. Calling it “group-like” would incorrectly erase its additional fusion channel.
Global geometry supplies another check. A symmetry surface that bounds a three-chain can be shrunk away only when the chain crosses no charged line and no background flux. On a manifold with torsion cycles, a flat background can have nontrivial holonomy even though its differential-form curvature vanishes. The correct charge is therefore a character of the global higher-form gauge field, not merely an integral of a locally defined form. This is why the gauge group’s global form and the allowed line lattice must accompany the linking phase.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”For , determine which Wilson charges are invisible to the surface .
Solution
The linking phase is . It is one precisely for modulo . The surface therefore detects the quotient of the charge group by its even subgroup, not every charge.
References
Section titled “References”- Gaiotto, Davide, Anton Kapustin, Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. “Generalized Global Symmetries.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2015, no. 2 (2015): 172. DOI; Open PDF.
- Kapustin, Anton, and Nathan Seiberg. “Coupling a QFT to a TQFT and Duality.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, no. 4 (2014): 001. DOI; Open PDF.