Holographic RG Flows and Domain-Wall Geometries
A Poincaré-invariant domain wall geometrizes one boundary RG trajectory when its scalar profiles, quantization branches, state, and regularity are specified. The warp factor provides a useful scale coordinate, scalar gradients define beta functions along that solution, and the null energy condition can produce monotone quantities. Radial position is nevertheless not a unique Wilsonian momentum cutoff, and a regular classical flow is not by itself a complete field-theory RG construction.
Required background. Radial Hamilton–Jacobi flow supplies radial evolution. Renormalized one-point functions separates source and response branches. Helpful background. Conformal perturbation theory and beta functions and Wilsonian theory space provide the boundary meanings being compared.
First application. Solve a simple Einstein-scalar domain wall near a critical point and extract the linearized beta function associated with the scalar mass.
Einstein–scalar domain walls
Section titled “Einstein–scalar domain walls”Use Lorentzian signature on the -dimensional slices and action
For
the Einstein equations include
and a first-order constraint relating , , and . With positive scalar target metric, . The sign is checked by pure AdS, for which and in a radial coordinate increasing toward the ultraviolet.
If a local superpotential exists such that
then a branch of solutions obeys
after choosing the compatible radial orientation. This first-order representation is useful but neither unique nor globally guaranteed.
Beta functions from the scale factor
Section titled “Beta functions from the scale factor”Along a monotonic segment of the solution, define
Near an AdS critical point, a scalar with has two branches. The source-driven branch behaves as
while a response-driven branch can have different leading behavior. Identifying with a renormalized coupling and with requires a declared source scheme. A normalizable condensate profile is not automatically a running coupling.
The radial Hamilton–Jacobi functional gives a more precise comparison: its local part generates beta-like source flow, while the finite nonlocal part carries expectation values. Finite counterterms reparameterize the couplings and transform beta functions as vector fields on theory space.
Fixed points, endpoints, and regularity
Section titled “Fixed points, endpoints, and regularity”At a critical point , the geometry approaches AdS and the boundary theory approaches a conformal fixed point if the full dictionary and stability conditions hold. An interior endpoint may instead be another AdS region, a cap, a horizon, or a singularity. A finite warp factor or potential alone does not classify it.
For singular domain walls, a commonly used necessary diagnostic is that the scalar potential remain bounded above along the solution so the singularity can arise as a limit of regular finite-temperature geometries Gubser 2000. This “good singularity” test is not a theorem of acceptable quantum-gravity completion; fluctuations, uplift, string corrections, and boundary observables still require checks.
A monotonic geometric quantity
Section titled “A monotonic geometric quantity”For Einstein matter satisfying the null energy condition, define schematically
with chosen so that matches the appropriate central coefficient at an AdS fixed point. Then
toward increasing when . Thus decreases from ultraviolet to infrared. Higher-curvature gravity, violations of the relevant energy condition, or nonmonotonic require a different argument.
As an explicit application, linearize about a critical point and solve the scalar equation. Extracting from the source branch and the fixed-point value of checks the mass-dimension relation, radial orientation, and central-charge normalization together.
Evidence boundary
Section titled “Evidence boundary”A smooth domain wall with correct ultraviolet falloffs demonstrates a classical bulk solution and a candidate RG interpretation. It does not prove that the infrared endpoint defines a unitary CFT, that the truncation is consistent in a top-down theory, or that radial integration equals Wilsonian elimination of high-momentum modes. Those are separate spectral, uplift, and cutoff-action tests.
The chapter overview contains the structure diagram and validity and failure diagram. They are embedded there once so that their shared chapter-level context is not repeated on every article.
For the chapter-wide comparison of assumptions, counterevidence, falsifiers, and claim ceilings, see the claim-domain table.
References
Section titled “References”- de Boer, J., Verlinde, E., and Verlinde, H. “On the Holographic Renormalization Group.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2000, 003 (2000). DOI. arXiv.
- Freedman, D. Z., Gubser, S. S., Pilch, K., and Warner, N. P. “Renormalization Group Flows from Holography—Supersymmetry and a c-Theorem.” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 3 (1999): 363–417. DOI. arXiv.
- Gubser, S. S. “Curvature Singularities: The Good, the Bad, and the Naked.” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 4 (2000): 679–745. DOI. arXiv.