The Affleck–Dine–Seiberg Superpotential
For massless SQCD with and , the exact Wilsonian superpotential is
Symmetry, holomorphy, and dimension fix the functional form; a controlled instanton fixes the initial coefficient; holomorphic decoupling fixes the coefficient for every lower . The massless theory has a runaway rather than a finite supersymmetric vacuum.
Required background. The SQCD theory card fixes , baryon number, R-charge, global form, and . Nonperturbative superpotentials supplies the general holomorphy and spurion logic.
Helpful background. Instantons, zero modes, and condensates gives the controlled calculation at .
Precise domain of the formula
Section titled “Precise domain of the formula”Assume:
- four-dimensional rigid supersymmetry;
- gauge group , not only gauge algebra ;
- pairs in fundamental and antifundamental representations;
- vanishing tree superpotential and no additional singlets;
- meson with no powers of absorbed;
- , ; and
- .
For , no baryon can be formed and is the only polynomial gauge-invariant coordinate. At a generic point the unbroken gauge group is , so the fractional power below also records the vacuum branches of that strong sector.
Symmetry and dimension leave one candidate
Section titled “Symmetry and dimension leave one candidate”Let and . The exact nonanomalous R-charge is
Therefore
A superpotential has R-charge two, so has exactly the required charge. Engineering dimensions give the same exponent:
and their difference is . Taking the th root produces dimension three. Flavor and baryon symmetries allow no additional tensor. Thus
where holomorphy alone leaves the number undetermined. This is the important logical pause: symmetry finds a one-dimensional space of candidates, not a nonzero coefficient.
Fixing the coefficient
Section titled “Fixing the coefficient”The controlled anchor
Section titled “The controlled anchor”At , a generic large meson expectation value completely Higgses . A one-instanton calculation is weakly coupled, the Higgs expectation value cuts off the size integral, and Yukawa interactions lift every zero mode except the universal two. With the conventions above it gives
so . This is the controlled dynamical input of Affleck, Dine, and Seiberg 1984, pp. 493–534.
The decoupling recursion
Section titled “The decoupling recursion”Suppose the answer for flavors is , with
where and is the light-flavor block. Add . The equation is
Substitution gives
where . The low-energy superpotential becomes
Starting from , this recursion yields . It simultaneously checks the exponent, threshold power, and branch count. The same chain is summarized in Intriligator and Seiberg 1996, § 4.1, pp. 12–15.
Fractional powers and branches
Section titled “Fractional powers and branches”The shorthand
has local branches. They are the gaugino-condensate branches of the unbroken sector at a generic meson point. A path around permutes them. The expression is therefore not a globally single-valued ordinary function on the punctured meson space; it is branch data for the effective theory.
The singularity at is physical. There the chosen description has integrated out degrees of freedom that become important, and the unbroken gauge group is larger. One should not smooth the singularity by choosing an arbitrary root or by treating as the only weakly coupled field there.
Mass deformation and the vacua
Section titled “Mass deformation and the NcN_cNc vacua”Add a nonsingular mass matrix,
Define
The matrix F-term is
Taking determinants and using the definition of gives
Thus there are supersymmetric solutions,
and at each solution
This is precisely pure-SYM gaugino condensation after the scale match
The calculation is an independent consistency loop: ADS plus masses reproduces the pure-gauge vacuum count and superpotential. The mass-deformed vacuum analysis and its decoupling interpretation are developed in Seiberg 1994, pp. 6857–6863.
The massless theory runs away
Section titled “The massless theory runs away”For , differentiating gives an inverse power of that cannot vanish at any finite nonsingular meson. Along with ,
and the F-term potential approaches zero. The theory therefore has a supersymmetric runaway at infinity, not a normalizable finite vacuum on this branch.
This distinction matters for index arguments. Sending the mass to zero moves the massive-theory vacua to infinite field values, so the asymptotic behavior of field space changes and the naive finite-volume index-continuity slogan does not apply.
The ADS term is an exact Wilsonian F-term. It does not determine the Kähler metric near strong coupling, and a potential estimate that uses a canonical metric outside the large-field regime is not exact.
Worked example: with one flavor
Section titled “Worked example: SU(3)SU(3)SU(3) with one flavor”Here , , and is one complex field:
The F-term gives and
There are three massive vacua, as required after the flavor decouples to pure . When , : the vacua do not remain at the origin but escape along the ADS runaway.
Common pitfalls
Section titled “Common pitfalls”Using the formula at . The exponent diverges because the correct object changes: the next regime has a quantum-modified constraint, not an ADS superpotential.
Calling symmetry a coefficient calculation. Symmetry and holomorphy fix the monomial. The nonzero coefficient requires an instanton anchor, decoupling, or another dynamical input.
Forgetting the branch. The fractional root represents the vacua of an unbroken gauge sector. A principal-value root erases physical monodromy.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”- Check that the ADS superpotential has baryon number zero and R-charge two.
Solution
has baryon number zero, so both and the full expression do. The exact R-symmetry leaves invariant, while . Raising its inverse to gives R-charge two.
- Decouple one flavor from the result and recover the coefficient two for .
Solution
Set in the recursion above. Eliminating the massive meson entry gives , and the low-energy superpotential is . Hence
which is the ADS formula with .
References
Section titled “References”- Affleck, Ian, Michael Dine, and Nathan Seiberg. “Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking in Supersymmetric QCD.” Nuclear Physics B 241 (1984): 493–534. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(84)90058-0.
- Intriligator, Kenneth, and Nathan Seiberg. “Lectures on Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and Electric-Magnetic Duality.” Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 45BC (1996): 1–28. doi:10.1016/0920-5632(95)00626-5. Open PDF.
- Seiberg, Nathan. “Exact Results on the Space of Vacua of Four-Dimensional SUSY Gauge Theories.” Physical Review D 49 (1994): 6857–6863. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.6857. Open PDF.