Skip to content

Spectral Pairing, Ground States, and Supersymmetry Breaking

Every isolated positive-energy eigenspace of a supersymmetric Hamiltonian has equal even and odd multiplicity because the normalized maps A/2EA/\sqrt{2E} and A/2EA^\dagger/\sqrt{2E} are inverse isometries there. Zero energy is exceptional: its even states lie in kerA\ker A, its odd states in kerA\ker A^\dagger, and normalizability plus the operator domain decide whether either kernel contains a physical state. Supersymmetry is unbroken when at least one normalized zero-energy state exists; a vanishing difference of the two kernel dimensions does not decide the question.

Required background. Supercharges, partner Hamiltonians, and positive energy fixes the grading, normalization, and domains used below. Helpful background. Vacua, states, and representations distinguishes a normalizable vacuum vector from a formal wavefunction or a spectral threshold.

Let A:DomAH0ˉH1ˉA:\operatorname{Dom}A\subset\mathcal H_{\bar0}\to\mathcal H_{\bar1} be densely defined and closed, and let

H0ˉ=12AA,H1ˉ=12AA.H_{\bar0}=\frac12A^\dagger A, \qquad H_{\bar1}=\frac12AA^\dagger.

Suppose E>0E>0 is an eigenvalue and ψDomH0ˉ\psi\in\operatorname{Dom}H_{\bar0} obeys H0ˉψ=EψH_{\bar0}\psi=E\psi. Then Aψ0A\psi\ne0, because otherwise Eψ2=ψH0ˉψ=0E\lVert\psi\rVert^2=\langle\psi|H_{\bar0}|\psi\rangle=0. Moreover,

H1ˉ(Aψ)=12AAAψ=A(H0ˉψ)=E(Aψ).H_{\bar1}(A\psi) =\frac12AA^\dagger A\psi =A(H_{\bar0}\psi) =E(A\psi).

This equation is legitimate on the stated domains: ψDom(AA)\psi\in\operatorname{Dom}(A^\dagger A) implies AψDomAA\psi\in\operatorname{Dom}A^\dagger, and AAψ=2EψDomAA^\dagger A\psi=2E\psi\in\operatorname{Dom}A implies AψDom(AA)A\psi\in\operatorname{Dom}(AA^\dagger). Its norm is

Aψ2=ψAAψ=2Eψ2.\lVert A\psi\rVert^2 =\langle\psi|A^\dagger A|\psi\rangle =2E\lVert\psi\rVert^2.

Consequently

UE=A2E:ker(H0ˉE)ker(H1ˉE)U_E=\frac{A}{\sqrt{2E}}: \ker(H_{\bar0}-E)\longrightarrow\ker(H_{\bar1}-E)

is an isometry. The inverse is A/2EA^\dagger/\sqrt{2E}, because AA=2EA^\dagger A=2E and AA=2EAA^\dagger=2E on the respective eigenspaces. Hence the two eigenspaces have the same dimension, including degeneracy. This is the domain-complete version of the familiar partner-potential argument Cooper, Khare, and Sukhatme 1995, §2, pp. 13–16 in the open version.

For continuous spectrum, generalized eigenfunctions can obey analogous intertwining relations, but they are not Hilbert-space vectors. The correct global statement uses the polar decomposition A=U(AA)1/2A=U(A^\dagger A)^{1/2}: away from zero, the partial isometry UU identifies the positive spectral subspaces. Threshold states, scattering normalization, and trace regularization require the separate analysis on the continuum and boundary page.

At zero energy the normalization 1/2E1/\sqrt{2E} is unavailable. Positivity instead gives

kerH0ˉ=kerA,kerH1ˉ=kerA,kerH=kerQkerQ.\begin{aligned} \ker H_{\bar0}&=\ker A,\\ \ker H_{\bar1}&=\ker A^\dagger,\\ \ker H&=\ker\mathcal Q\cap\ker\mathcal Q^\dagger. \end{aligned}

Indeed, ψH0ˉψ=Aψ2/2\langle\psi|H_{\bar0}|\psi\rangle=\lVert A\psi\rVert^2/2, and similarly in the odd sector. A normalized vector in either kernel is annihilated by both Hermitian supercharges and is therefore a supersymmetric ground state.

Three situations must be kept separate:

Spectrum near zeroNormalized zero mode?Conclusion
Discrete, with E0=0E_0=0YesSupersymmetry is unbroken.
Discrete, with E0>0E_0>0NoSupersymmetry is spontaneously broken; the ground states occur in positive-energy pairs.
infσ(H)=0\inf\sigma(H)=0 but zero is only continuous spectrumNo Hilbert-space vectorThere is no normalizable supersymmetric vacuum. An infrared regulator and a specified representation are needed before importing finite-volume breaking language.

The last line is why “the energy can approach zero” is not equivalent to “there is a zero-energy state.”

For the one-dimensional realization

A=ddx+w(x),A=ddx+w(x),A=\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}+w(x), \qquad A^\dagger=-\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}+w(x),

let W(x)=w(x)W'(x)=w(x). The zero-mode equations integrate exactly:

Aψ0ˉ=0ψ0ˉ(x)=C0ˉeW(x),Aψ1ˉ=0ψ1ˉ(x)=C1ˉe+W(x).\begin{aligned} A\psi_{\bar0}=0 &\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \psi_{\bar0}(x)=C_{\bar0}e^{-W(x)},\\ A^\dagger\psi_{\bar1}=0 &\quad\Longrightarrow\quad \psi_{\bar1}(x)=C_{\bar1}e^{+W(x)}. \end{aligned}

These are candidate states. A physical zero mode must also belong to L2L^2, satisfy all boundary conditions, and lie in the chosen operator domain. On the full line:

  • if W(x)+W(x)\to+\infty at both ends fast enough, the even candidate is normalizable and the odd one is not;
  • if W(x)W(x)\to-\infty at both ends fast enough, the odd candidate is normalizable and the even one is not;
  • if WW has opposite signs at the two ends, neither exponential is normalizable.

“Fast enough” is essential. If WclogxW\sim c\log|x|, square-integrability depends on cc, not only on the sign. Singular points and finite endpoints likewise require the actual self-adjoint boundary condition. The first-order test and its relation to broken and unbroken supersymmetry are developed explicitly in Cooper, Khare, and Sukhatme 1995, §§2.1–2.2, pp. 18–25 in the open version.

For w(x)=ωxw(x)=\omega x, W(x)=ωx2/2W(x)=\omega x^2/2 tends to ++\infty at both ends. The normalized even zero mode is

ψ0ˉ,0(x)=(ωπ)1/4eωx2/2,\psi_{\bar0,0}(x) =\left(\frac{\omega}{\pi}\right)^{1/4} e^{-\omega x^2/2},

while e+ωx2/2e^{+\omega x^2/2} is not square-integrable. The positive energies are the paired oscillator levels E=nωE=n\omega, n=1,2,n=1,2,\ldots, and supersymmetry is unbroken.

Now take

w(x)=x2a2,W(x)=x33a2x,a>0.w(x)=x^2-a^2, \qquad W(x)=\frac{x^3}{3}-a^2x, \qquad a>0.

As x+x\to+\infty, W+W\to+\infty; as xx\to-\infty, WW\to-\infty. Therefore eWe^{-W} diverges at the left end and e+We^{+W} diverges at the right end. Neither is a state. Yet the partner potentials grow as x4/2x^4/2, so the spectrum is discrete and has a lowest eigenvalue. Positivity and absence of a zero mode force E0>0E_0>0: supersymmetry is broken, and even the lowest level is paired. This normalizability criterion is the one-dimensional mechanism used in Witten 1981, §2, pp. 515–523.

The two zeros of ww produce semiclassical wells, but local wells do not determine the exact ground-state energy. Tunneling couples their approximate states and removes the would-be zero-energy degeneracy. The Morse and tunneling page explains the geometric version of this mechanism.

It does not say that the total dimensions of H0ˉ\mathcal H_{\bar0} and H1ˉ\mathcal H_{\bar1} are equal. It equates only positive-energy spectral multiplicities under the domain hypotheses.

It does not say that every formal solution of Aψ=0A\psi=0 is a vacuum. Normalizability, endpoints, singularities, and self-adjoint extension data are decisive. In singular half-line models, changing the extension can preserve the full two-supercharge algebra, reduce it, or break it Falomir and Pisani 2005, abstract and §§3–4.

It also does not say that zero Witten index means broken supersymmetry. The index is a signed difference of even and odd zero modes; both can be nonzero and cancel. That inference is treated carefully on the Witten-index page.

Classify the supersymmetric ground states for w(x)=ωxw(x)=-\omega x on R\mathbb R, with ω>0\omega>0.

Solution

Here W(x)=ωx2/2W(x)=-\omega x^2/2. The even candidate eW=e+ωx2/2e^{-W}=e^{+\omega x^2/2} is not normalizable, while the odd candidate e+W=eωx2/2e^{+W}=e^{-\omega x^2/2} is. There is one odd supersymmetric vacuum. This is the sector exchange www\mapsto-w of the ordinary supersymmetric oscillator; the positive spectrum is unchanged and the signed index changes from +1+1 to 1-1.