Holomorphic and Canonical Couplings and the NSVZ Relation
The holomorphic gauge coupling and the canonically normalized gauge coupling are different coordinates. In a holomorphic Wilsonian normalization the perturbative running is one-loop exact; anomalous Jacobians generated while canonically normalizing the vector and matter fields convert that simple flow into the NSVZ relation. The displayed rational beta function is exact only in a scheme that preserves this coupling relation.
Required background. R-symmetry, anomalies, and the holomorphic scale fixes , , and . Beta functions and anomalous dimensions fixes the RG definitions. Gauge–matter actions and F- and D-potentials supplies the superspace kinetic terms.
Helpful background. Operator mixing and renormalization matrices explains why anomalous dimensions depend on a basis when fields mix.
Two gauge couplings
Section titled “Two gauge couplings”For a simple gauge group , let
multiply the chiral gauge kinetic term in a holomorphic Wilsonian action. Matter kinetic terms have real coefficients ,
Canonical matter fields are . Canonically normalizing the vector multiplet similarly defines through the interaction vertices. These changes of variables are not holomorphic functions of the chiral coupling: and are real. Their regulated functional Jacobians shift the coefficient of .
We choose
If fields mix, and are matrices, and the matter contribution below is the appropriately traced representation-weighted matrix expression. The scalar formula assumes a basis in which the relevant are diagonal.
The anomalous rescaling relation
Section titled “The anomalous rescaling relation”In an NSVZ normalization, the real parts of the holomorphic and canonical couplings obey
where is a scale-independent convention constant. The term comes from canonically normalizing the vector multiplet; the matter terms are Konishi rescaling anomalies. With the opposite convention , sources often write the term with the opposite sign. The invariant check is the beta function derived from the paired definitions, not one isolated sign.
This relation is not a classical field redefinition. Its logarithms are the finite remnants of regulated Jacobians. Arkani-Hamed and Murayama give a Wilsonian cutoff derivation in which holomorphy and these Jacobians are manifest Arkani-Hamed and Murayama 2000, §§ 2–4.
The holomorphic coupling satisfies
Differentiate the anomalous rescaling relation:
Solving gives the NSVZ relation
The numerator contains the matter anomalous dimensions, which also depend on superpotential couplings . The original instanton-based expression and its supersymmetric extensions were developed by Novikov, Shifman, Vainshtein, and Zakharov Novikov et al. 1983, pp. 381–393.
What “exact” means here
Section titled “What “exact” means here”The equation is exact as a relation among RG functions in an NSVZ scheme. A finite redefinition
changes , , and generally the visible rational form beyond the universal low-loop data. Dimensional reduction with minimal subtraction does not automatically coincide with the NSVZ scheme at every order; finite redefinitions can relate schemes order by order Jack, Jones, and North 1997, pp. 479–499.
Accordingly:
- the one-loop coefficient is universal in ordinary mass-independent schemes;
- the holomorphic one-loop flow refers to , not the physical canonical coupling;
- the denominator’s pole is a coordinate feature of this NSVZ coupling and is not, by itself, evidence for a physical singularity; and
- a zero of the numerator is a candidate fixed point only if the chosen coupling coordinates are regular and all other beta functions vanish.
At a superconformal fixed point with finite denominator,
This condition is invariantly related to the anomaly-free superconformal R-symmetry, but solving for still requires dynamics and the superpotential constraints.
SQCD translation
Section titled “SQCD translation”For SQCD with pairs and equal anomalous dimensions , the representation sum is . Hence
If the theory reaches an interacting fixed point in a regime where this description is valid, the numerator condition gives
This is consistent with and the superconformal relation for . The agreement checks the signs and group factors; it does not prove that the fixed point exists for every .
The holomorphic scale remains
Trying to replace by in this formula without the and Jacobian factors destroys RG invariance. Exact superpotentials are naturally written using the holomorphic scale; physical thresholds are then obtained after canonical normalization.
Common pitfalls
Section titled “Common pitfalls”Calling the measured gauge coupling. The holomorphic coordinate makes supersymmetry transparent. Scattering amplitudes and canonical kinetic terms involve and wavefunction data.
Quoting NSVZ without a gamma convention. The sign of and of the term must be declared together. A formula copied across conventions can fail already at two loops.
Treating the denominator pole as a phase transition. A finite coupling redefinition moves or removes such a coordinate pole. Only scheme-invariant observables can diagnose a physical singularity.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Starting from the anomalous rescaling relation, reproduce the NSVZ beta function and identify the origin of its numerator and denominator.
Solution
Differentiate with respect to . The one-loop holomorphic derivative supplies . The derivatives of give , producing in the numerator. The derivative of combines with that of to give in the denominator.
Show that the SQCD fixed-point value of agrees with the anomaly-free R-charge.
Solution
The numerator condition gives . Therefore
This is the required chiral-primary relation.
References
Section titled “References”- Nima Arkani-Hamed and Hitoshi Murayama, “Holomorphy, Rescaling Anomalies and Exact Beta Functions in Supersymmetric Gauge Theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2000(06), 030, arXiv, DOI.
- I. Jack, D. R. T. Jones, and C. G. North, “Scheme Dependence and the NSVZ Beta Function,” Nuclear Physics B 486 (1997), 479–499, arXiv, DOI.
- V. A. Novikov, M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, “Exact Gell-Mann–Low Function of Supersymmetric Yang–Mills Theories from Instanton Calculus,” Nuclear Physics B 229 (1983), 381–393, DOI.