Skip to content

Dispersion, Positivity, and UV Constraints

Dispersion relations connect low-energy amplitude coefficients to discontinuities at higher energies. Positivity emerges only when the contour, growth, crossing, pole subtraction, and physical-state sum make the relevant integral sign-definite. This chapter makes those conditions part of the bound.

Begin with Subtracted Dispersion Relations to identify the analytic domain and subtraction freedom before applying positivity.

  1. Subtracted Dispersion Relations — Determines which singularity data and subtraction constants reconstruct an amplitude.
  2. Forward Scattering Sum Rules — Relates low-energy moments to inclusive absorptive data.
  3. Fixed-t and Partial-Wave Dispersion — Retains angular information beyond the forward amplitude.
  4. Forward-Limit Positivity Bounds — Derives sign constraints in a gapped channel with a finite forward limit.
  5. Beyond-Forward Positivity — Adds angular derivatives and crossing relations under stronger hypotheses.
  6. Massless Exchange and Infrared Subtractions — Diagnoses forward poles, moving branch points, and infrared modifications.
  7. EFT Positivity and UV Consistency — Translates physical amplitude bounds into qualified EFT statements.

A subtracted contour relation can express derivatives of a pole-subtracted forward amplitude as weighted absorptive integrals. Unitarity supplies the sign of the physical forward discontinuity, while analyticity and high-energy control justify the contour manipulation. If the channel has nonzero absorptive weight, suitable moments are strictly positive; a decoupled channel may saturate zero. See de Rham et al. 2017, equations (1)–(6).

Massless exchange can make the forward limit singular and requires a new argument. A bound also concerns physical amplitude combinations, not an arbitrary basis coefficient whose value can change under field redefinitions.

Does satisfying all bounds checked in a finite calculation prove that an EFT has a conventional ultraviolet completion?

Solution

No. Those bounds are necessary consequences of the chosen completion assumptions, not a construction of a theory. Other channels, higher orders, untested inequalities, or additional consistency conditions can still obstruct a completion.

Continue to EFT Positivity and UV Consistency for the precise translation between amplitude coefficients and effective interactions.

  • Claudia de Rham, Scott Melville, Andrew J. Tolley, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, “Positivity Bounds for Scalar Theories,” Physical Review D 96 (2017), 081702. DOI. Open PDF.