Distributional Correlators, Zero Modes, and Normalization
Noncompact CFT correlators often live in a space of distributions over continuous quantum numbers. A momentum-conserving Dirac delta, its value at zero, and a target-space volume are related but not interchangeable. This page derives the zero-mode distribution, compares Gaussian and finite-box regulators, and states the test-function and limit prescriptions needed to turn formal expressions into well-defined observables.
Required background. Noncompact CFTs and continuous spectra fixes the free-boson state and measure conventions used here. Tempered distributions and Fourier calculus supplies the definition of convergence by pairing with test functions.
Helpful background. Coincident products and contact terms distinguishes distributional extensions in spacetime from conservation deltas in spectral labels.
A zero mode produces a distribution
Section titled “A zero mode produces a distribution”Use the noncompact free-boson normalization
and split
The constant mode of an -point function gives
The full plane correlator is therefore
For two insertions,
The normalization matches
This delta-normalized structure is standard for continuous CFT spectra; see Ribault 2018, §2.2.3, pp. 39–42, and §4.1.3, pp. 101–103.
The correlator is defined through smearing. For smooth test functions and for which the integral converges,
The qualification on the test functions matters. The bare delta distribution is tempered on Schwartz space. At fixed , however, the multiplier grows like and is not a Schwartz multiplier. One may first use compactly supported functions in momentum, or wave packets with sufficiently strong Gaussian decay, and enlarge the test space only after proving continuity. Calling the entire momentum-labelled correlator “tempered” without this check is generally too strong.
Gaussian regularization
Section titled “Gaussian regularization”Regulate the zero-mode integral by
Then
where
For every Schwartz function ,
This is the statement in . Pointwise behavior is irrelevant: the peak diverges at and tends to zero at every fixed .
An exact diagnostic uses the Gaussian test function with :
If a numerical regulator does not reproduce this formula within its stated quadrature and truncation error, its normalization is wrong before any CFT-specific test is attempted.
A finite box and the Kronecker-to-Dirac limit
Section titled “A finite box and the Kronecker-to-Dirac limit”Alternatively restrict the zero mode to . Its Fourier kernel is
with and distributionally as . If the target is genuinely compact with , its momenta are and
The continuum correspondence is therefore
Both relations must be used together. Replacing the Kronecker delta by a Dirac delta while leaving the sum unchanged creates an extra factor of . The compact and uncompactified boson zero-mode factors are compared in Di Francesco, Mathieu, and Sénéchal 1997, §§10.1–10.2, pp. 337–343.
The Gaussian and box regulators have different shapes. One can match their peak heights by setting
but that does not make them pointwise equal. Regulator-independent claims must be formulated after smearing and taking the limit, or with an error estimate that controls the difference for the chosen test functions.
Volume division is an observable choice
Section titled “Volume division is an observable choice”At total momentum , the unregulated zero-mode integral is the target volume
There are three distinct quantities one might report:
| Quantity | Definition | Appropriate use |
|---|---|---|
| Extensive correlator or trace | Retain or its regulator | A finite compact target followed as grows |
| Density per target volume | Divide a neutral trace or observable by before | Thermodynamic or modular densities |
| Momentum-space distribution | Retain and smear in | Charged correlators and scattering-state normalization |
These operations are not interchangeable. Dividing by the regulated Gaussian volume gives , which tends to zero as a distribution even though it equals one at . A per-volume neutral observable is defined by restricting to the neutral sector and dividing the extensive trace, not by dividing a generic charge-conservation delta distribution pointwise.
For shift-invariant quantities, another option is to work directly with the quotient by the constant-mode symmetry. The gauge or quotient measure must then be declared, and charged vertex operators are not observables on that quotient unless accompanied by a compensating insertion.
Global deltas versus contact terms
Section titled “Global deltas versus contact terms”Two superficially similar distributions have different supports and meanings:
- lives in momentum-label space and follows from integrating a global zero mode. It is present even when all spacetime insertion points are distinct.
- lives in spacetime and is supported at coincident insertions. It can arise when extending singular products or differentiating Ward identities.
A counterterm can change contact terms without changing the global momentum-conservation delta. Conversely, dividing by a target volume does not remove a spacetime contact term. Any equality that is asserted only for separated points should say so; any integrated Ward identity must keep the allowed contact terms.
A reliable order of operations
Section titled “A reliable order of operations”For a distribution-valued CFT calculation:
- declare the zero-mode measure and the normalization of continuum states;
- introduce a regulator with its dimensions and normalization;
- pair the expression with a stated test-function class;
- perform the CFT or spectral integrals where absolute convergence justifies the order;
- remove the regulator in the weak topology of the chosen distribution space;
- only then specialize labels, divide by a volume, or take coincident limits when those operations are defined;
- state any contact-term ambiguity or noncommuting limit that remains.
Fubini’s theorem cannot be invoked for conditionally convergent contour integrals without additional bounds. In particular, taking before removing a zero-mode regulator produces , while smearing first produces the finite value .
The resulting measures enter torus consistency on Nonrational modular consistency and spectral densities.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Test the box regulator
Section titled “Test the box regulator”Show distributionally that tends to as .
Solution
For a Schwartz function , use the Fourier transform
Then
Because is Schwartz, the limit is by Fourier inversion.
Identify a noncommuting specialization
Section titled “Identify a noncommuting specialization”For the Gaussian regulator, compare (i) and (ii) .
Solution
The pointwise value is
The smeared limit is , which is finite. Evaluating a distribution at a point is not a continuous operation; the second limit is the definition of distributional convergence.