Sphere Partition Functions and Universal CFT Data
The sphere partition function packages a CFT’s response to curvature in one number, but that number is not universally meaningful in every dimension. In even dimensions the logarithmic radius dependence is controlled by the Euler anomaly while the finite part is counterterm dependent. In odd dimensions the real finite part can be universal under the usual locality and symmetry assumptions. Zero modes, gauge volumes, and source contacts must be treated before either statement is applied.
Required background. Anomaly Coefficients and Central Charges fixes type-A normalization. Weyl Covariance on Curved Backgrounds fixes the generating functional. Helpful background. Defect Entropy and Monotonicity compares sphere-like observables localized on a defect.
Radius response on a round sphere
Section titled “Radius response on a round sphere”Define
A constant change of radius is a Weyl rescaling, so in the convention of this chapter
For a two-dimensional CFT with , this gives . For a four-dimensional CFT with
the round sphere has , , and , hence
These two signs follow from the displayed anomaly basis; changing the definition of or changes them coherently. The coefficient of is universal, while a finite -independent term can be shifted by local curvature counterterms.
Odd and even dimensions
Section titled “Odd and even dimensions”The useful distinction is:
| Dimension | Universal sphere datum on a closed sphere | Main qualification |
|---|---|---|
| Even | coefficient of the logarithm, proportional to type-A data | finite part is scheme dependent |
| Odd | real finite part | parity-odd phases and topological counterterms are separate |
| Noninteger in an expansion | a chosen analytic continuation such as | continuation and subtraction convention must be stated |
In three dimensions, the use of the real sphere free energy as an endpoint quantity and its perturbative tests are developed in Klebanov, Pufu, and Safdi 2011. This does not remove the zero-mode, phase, or endpoint qualifications stated here.
A frequently useful interpolation is
which connects odd-dimensional finite terms to even-dimensional anomaly residues in dimensional regularization Giombi and Klebanov 2015, §§1–2. Its normalization depends on how the even-dimensional pole is subtracted; it is a computational bridge, not a new dimension-independent theorem.
Source derivatives and integrated correlators
Section titled “Source derivatives and integrated correlators”Deform the sphere action by constant sources :
Then
and
The sign follows from adding to the action. Coincident-point singularities make the double integral regulator dependent; contact counterterms can alter the Hessian. On a conformal manifold, a protected combination can define the Zamolodchikov metric only after redundant directions and source coordinates are fixed.
Zero modes and normalization
Section titled “Zero modes and normalization”A functional determinant with a zero eigenvalue is not defined by simply including that eigenvalue in . One must separate the zero mode, integrate or divide by its physical volume, and state the measure normalization. Examples include:
- the constant mode of a noncompact massless scalar;
- gauge transformations and ghost zero modes;
- Goldstone modes in a spontaneously broken description;
- collective coordinates around a saddle.
Different choices can add or volume factors that mimic an anomaly. The cure is a mode-by-mode definition plus a comparison to the flat-space or heat-kernel normalization, not an ad hoc deletion after the result is known.
The anomaly-to-sphere branch of the Weyl response diagram has this structured equivalent:
| Stage | Retain | Do not confuse with |
|---|---|---|
| Regulated determinant or path integral | regulator, measure, zero-mode prescription | renormalized |
| Local subtraction | divergent and finite curvature counterterms | universal coefficient |
| Even-dimensional output | logarithmic coefficient | arbitrary finite constant |
| Odd-dimensional output | real finite part in a symmetry-preserving scheme | parity-odd phase |
| Source differentiation | integrated connected correlator plus contacts | separated-point correlator alone |
In the diagram, inspect the branch from background-source variation through the trace identity and local renormalization to sphere data; the flow conclusion remains a separate, hypothesis-dependent comparison.
Sphere data become universal only after local counterterms and zero modes are separated. In even dimensions the logarithmic branch is retained; in odd dimensions the appropriate real finite branch is retained. The diagram is schematic.
Reproduce the plane–cylinder anomaly and sphere/deformation checks with frozen inputs and declared tolerances.
Evidence scope and reproducibility
Section titled “Evidence scope and reproducibility”The theorem-level statements and computational conventions on this page were checked against the cited literature through 9 August 2026. A sphere calculation intended as evidence should publish the spectrum or integrand, regulator, counterterm basis, zero-mode measure, numerical precision, radius convention, and a scale-derivative check. The raw number without those data is not comparable across methods.
Common pitfalls
Section titled “Common pitfalls”Calling the even-dimensional finite part universal. A finite local curvature counterterm shifts it. The logarithmic coefficient is the invariant datum.
Deleting zero modes silently. Their measure and physical quotient can contribute scale dependence. State the treatment before evaluating the determinant.
Equating a source Hessian with an ordinary integrated two-point function. Coincident singularities generate local terms. The metric or susceptibility is defined only after a subtraction and coordinate convention.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”Derive in the convention above.
Solution
The round sphere is conformally flat and has constant scalar curvature, so only contributes. Since , the integral is .
References
Section titled “References”- Giombi, S., and Klebanov, I. R. “Interpolating between and .” Journal of High Energy Physics 2015, 117 (2015). arXiv. DOI.
- Klebanov, I. R., Pufu, S. S., and Safdi, B. R. “F-Theorem without Supersymmetry.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2011, 038 (2011). arXiv. DOI.