Skip to content

Matching, Decoupling, and Threshold Evolution

Matching determines how short-distance physics enters a low-energy theory. The central operation is a controlled comparison: calculate the same low-energy object in a full theory and in its EFT, with the light states, infrared prescription, field normalization, basis, and renormalization scheme aligned. Their difference fixes Wilson coefficients; renormalization-group evolution then transports those coefficients between thresholds and the scale of observation.

Begin with Integrating Out Heavy Fields to distinguish removing a heavy field from making a local low-energy expansion.

  1. Integrating Out Heavy Fields — Derives the light-field action after the heavy field is integrated out.
  2. Matching with Amplitudes, Green Functions, and Background Fields — Chooses matching data with compatible gauge, field, and basis conventions.
  3. Tree-Level Matching and Classical Elimination — Uses classical elimination to reproduce virtual heavy exchange.
  4. Matching Conditions Beyond Tree Level — Determines the hard remainder of full-theory and EFT loop calculations.
  5. Infrared Cancellation, Regulators, and Matching Consistency — Checks cancellation of shared low-energy singularities.
  6. Decoupling Theorems and Threshold Corrections — States the assumptions under which heavy particles decouple.
  7. Running and Matching across Multiple Thresholds — Orders running and matching across several particle thresholds.
  8. Nondecoupling Effects and Matching Validation — Distinguishes genuine heavy-mass effects from inconsistent comparisons.

Tree-level elimination and loop matching implement the same requirement: the full theory and EFT must reproduce the same low-energy quantity. Their shared infrared behavior cancels in the difference, leaving short-distance coefficients. Running subsequently transports those coefficients within a fixed theory; it cannot replace matching when the particle content changes. Decoupling is conditional on the heavy-mass limit: couplings that grow with that mass can invalidate a simple inverse-mass suppression argument. Georgi 1993, §§ 2–4.

Continue to Operator Bases and Field Redefinitions to distinguish independent interactions from an unreduced operator list.

  • Georgi, Howard. “Effective Field Theory.” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 43 (1993): 209–252. DOI