Integrable Quantum Matter and Generalized Hydrodynamics
Integrable quantum matter retains an extensive family of conserved quantities. Generalized hydrodynamics converts that microscopic structure into large-scale motion by evolving the occupations of interacting quasiparticles.
Enter this chapter
Section titled “Enter this chapter”Begin with Bethe-Integrable Quantum Gases and Spin Chains to connect scattering data to Bethe quantization in gases and spin chains.
Helpful background. Bethe-Integrable Quantum Gases and Spin Chains and Generalized Hydrodynamics of Integrable Systems develop the definitions used by the chapter’s opening pages.
Topics
Section titled “Topics”- Bethe-Integrable Quantum Gases and Spin Chains — Fixes scattering, quantization, rapidity, string, energy, momentum, and boundary conventions.
- Root Densities, Macrostates, and Model Observables — Derives thermodynamic Bethe equations, dressing, entropy, charges, and the effective velocity.
- Integrable Charges and Generalized-Ensemble Model Tests — Tests whether local and quasilocal charges reconstruct the full macrostate.
- Quench Action and Integrable Steady States — Combines overlap large deviations and Yang–Yang entropy to select a stationary root density.
- Generalized-Hydrodynamic Riemann Problems and Trap Expansions — Solves Euler characteristics for bipartitions and trapped gases.
- Diffusive GHD Corrections as Model Benchmarks — Adds positive Navier–Stokes and fluctuation corrections and separates anomalous sectors.
- Weak Integrability Breaking and Hydrodynamic Crossover — Derives slow-charge rates and collision terms with a controlled prethermal window.
- Finite-Size and Experimental Validation of Integrable Matter — Propagates platform, boundary, finite-size, resolution, and covariance into evidence.
How the ideas fit together
Section titled “How the ideas fit together”Bethe root densities specify a thermodynamic macrostate. Scattering with the occupied background dresses quasiparticle velocities, so transport depends on the entire local distribution rather than a few thermodynamic numbers Castro-Alvaredo, Doyon, and Yoshimura 2016, §§ 2–4.
Conserved charges or quench overlaps select that distribution; Euler evolution transports it. Diffusive corrections and weak integrability breaking then describe different departures from the ideal limit. Agreement with an Euler-scale density profile alone does not determine diffusive broadening, breaking rates, or the full microscopic state.
The comparison below separates the assumptions and tests needed for these different conclusions.
Integrable-matter claim test matrix
Section titled “Integrable-matter claim test matrix”Scroll horizontally to compare all columns. Use the Left and Right arrow keys when the table region is focused. Home and End move to the edges.
| Description or claim | Quasiparticles and charges | Dressing and entropy | Initial-state input | Euler or diffusive observable | Breaking and finite size | Validation test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cross-chapter contract |
Species, rapidity measure, physical , , , and charge basis fixed |
One kernel sign and explicit convention; Yang–Yang counting stated |
GGE, overlap, LDA, or measured root density identified |
Hydrodynamic order and measured quantity declared |
Earliest and latest relevant breaking times, , boundaries, and losses bounded |
Exact charge, entropy, grid, held-out, and observation-map checks |
|
Finite-volume Bethe model |
Real roots or declared string/nested species; branch quantum numbers |
No thermodynamic dressing yet |
Boundary condition and symmetry sector |
Spectrum, energy, momentum, and form-factor input |
Exponential/string and algebraic corrections |
Exact diagonalization and state counting at several |
|
Root-density macrostate |
, for every retained species |
; |
Thermodynamic eigenstate or local ensemble |
Charge densities, currents, susceptibilities, |
Species and rapidity cutoff; finite-volume spacing |
Bethe equation, positivity, sum rules, cutoff convergence |
|
Charge-complete GGE |
Local and quasilocal span root-density space |
TBA saddle and covariance from the same convention |
Initial charge densities and symmetries |
Stationary local observables |
Finite charge set leaves inverse null directions |
Rank, held-out charges, quench-action or time-evolution comparison |
|
Quench-action steady state |
Bethe species allowed by nonzero overlaps |
, with entropy restricted to overlap-allowed states |
Normalized initial-state overlaps and selection rules |
Stationary local observables and excitations |
Subextensive overlap, degeneracy, recurrence |
Finite-size diagonal sums, charge reconstruction, direct dynamics |
|
Euler Riemann or trap GHD |
Local fillings for all species and dressed velocities |
|
Left/right GGE or calibrated initial LDA profile |
Ballistic density and current profile |
Gradient, boundary, force, , breaking time |
Charge conservation, grid refinement, alternate initial reconstruction |
|
Diffusive GHD |
Same species plus scattering-shift fluctuations |
symmetric positive; entropy production nonnegative |
Smooth local macrostate and calibrated initial width |
broadening and Navier–Stokes currents |
Anomalous sector, free dispersion, finite time and resolution |
Positivity, null modes, exact limits, multi-time shared fit |
|
Weakly broken integrability |
Nearly conserved charges plus exact residual charges |
Slow-mode susceptibility and collision entropy |
Prepared prethermal macrostate |
Rate matrix or collision-corrected GHD |
Resonances, secular terms, rare processes, bath, heating |
scaling, size scaling, several modes and late times |
|
Experimental integrable matter |
Platform-calibrated quasiparticle model and observable |
Thermodynamic and hydrodynamic solver covariance |
Trap, temperature, interaction, preparation, transverse modes |
Convolved density, momentum, correlation, or current data |
Atom number, boundaries, loss, breaking, recurrence |
Independent calibration, held-out times, alternative model, exact cutoff |
Table data (JSON, version 1.0.0) · JSON schema
Where to go next
Section titled “Where to go next”Continue to Nonequilibrium, Driven, and Open Quantum Matter to distinguish dephasing, local relaxation, and prethermal evolution after a quench.
References
Section titled “References”- Castro-Alvaredo, O. A., Doyon, B., and Yoshimura, T. (2016). “Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium.” Physical Review X 6, 041065. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041065.