Skip to content

Nonequilibrium, Driven, and Open Quantum Matter

Quenches, periodic drives, constraints, and environments give quantum matter several routes away from equilibrium. Their observable behavior depends on preparation and timescale as well as the Hamiltonian.

Begin with Quenches and Relaxation in Lattice and Continuum Matter to distinguish dephasing, local relaxation, and prethermal evolution after a quench.

Helpful background. Quenches and Relaxation in Lattice and Continuum Matter and Equilibration, Thermalization, and Dephasing develop the definitions used by the chapter’s opening pages.

  1. Quenches and Relaxation in Lattice and Continuum Matter — How do quench protocol, conserved quantities, spectra, and observable choice distinguish dephasing, prethermalization, equilibration, and thermalization in a model?
  2. Kibble–Zurek Scaling and Defect Production — How does a finite-rate ramp through a quantum critical region set freeze-out scales and defect production?
  3. Nonthermal Fixed-Point Realizations in Quantum Matter — Which model and platform observables establish self-similar approach to a nonthermal fixed point rather than transient redistribution?
  4. Floquet Engineering in Quantum Matter — How can periodic driving engineer a useful quantum-matter Hamiltonian within a controlled prethermal window?
  5. Floquet Phases and Discrete Time Crystals — Which eigenstate, response, rigidity, lifetime, and thermodynamic criteria define Floquet phases and discrete time crystals?
  6. Quantum-Scar Models and Exceptional Eigenstates — How do quantum-scar models produce exceptional nonthermal eigenstates and revivals inside an otherwise thermal spectrum?
  7. Hilbert-Space Fragmentation and Constrained Dynamics — How do kinetic constraints split Hilbert space into invariant sectors, and which observables distinguish fragmentation from symmetry sectors, scars, or localization?
  8. Driven-Dissipative Condensate, Cavity, and Circuit Matter — How do coherent drive, loss, measurement, and interaction create steady states and transitions in condensate, cavity, circuit, and programmable matter?
  9. Dynamical Phase Transitions and Loschmidt Diagnostics — What do nonanalytic Loschmidt-rate functions or dynamical order parameters establish, and how are they related—or not—to equilibrium phases?
  10. Heating, Finite Size, and Open-System Evidence — How are heating, prethermal plateaus, recurrences, loss, bath memory, and measurement backaction separated in nonequilibrium quantum-matter evidence?

A high-frequency drive can produce an effective Hamiltonian over a long prethermal interval while still causing heating at later times. Micromotion and the observation protocol are part of that effective description Bukov, D’Alessio, and Polkovnikov 2015, §§ 2–3.

Constraints, scars, and fragmentation can preserve memory by different mechanisms, while baths introduce loss and noise. Similar revivals or slow relaxation therefore do not identify one mechanism. Compare the signal’s time window with heating, recurrence, and environmental times before interpreting temporal order or a stationary phase.

The comparison below separates the assumptions and tests needed for these different conclusions.

RegimeProtocol and controlling objectPrimary observableExpected lifetime or size trendMain alternativeStrongest bounded claim
DephasingSudden quench; post-quench energy gapsLocal correlator or imbalanceStationary fluctuations shrink with effective dimension; recurrences move with sizeCoarse time resolutionObservable equilibrates over a declared window
Kibble–Zurek productionCritical ramp; t^\hat t and ξ^\hat\xiDefect density or correlation lengthPower law in ramp time, then finite-size saturationPost-ramp coarseningFreeze-out scaling in an independently fixed critical window
Nonthermal fixed pointFar-from-equilibrium quench; scaling functionn(k,t)n(k,t) collapse and transported invariantScaling range widens before infrared or ultraviolet cutoffTransient redistribution or imaging convolutionFinite-window self-similar dynamics
Floquet engineeringPeriodic drive; HeffH_{\mathrm{eff}} plus micromotionHeld-out stroboscopic and intraperiod observablesError decreases with expansion order until resonances or noise dominateCalibrated single-particle dressing onlyEngineered dynamics within a prethermal window
Discrete time crystalPeriodic drive; quasienergy pairing or prethermal symmetry breakingRigid subharmonic correlationsLifetime grows with size or drive frequency according to mechanismBeat note, synchronization, or recurrenceRobust finite-window temporal order
Many-body scarsSpecial quench; exceptional spectral towerState-selective fidelity and local revivalTower reconstruction and perturbation trend persist with sizeAccidental commensurabilityScar-enhanced revival dynamics in a specified model
Hilbert-space fragmentationKinetic constraint; Krylov connectivity graphSector participation and memoryExact sectors remain disconnected; weak breaking gives coupling-dependent leakageDisorder localization or slow energeticsFragment-resolved dynamics or a prefragmented window
Driven-dissipative criticalityCoherent drive and loss; LiouvillianOutput correlations and relaxation gapGap closes only in a declared large-system or large-occupation limitFinite-system switchingMetastability or open critical scaling, as tested
Loschmidt transitionGlobal quench; return-rate Fisher zerosReturn probability and critical-time scalingRounding sharpens with sizeSmooth local crossoverDynamical return-rate criticality
Bath- or measurement-limited behaviorDrive or quench plus environment; channel or memory kernelUnconditional and conditional recordsRate follows bath coupling, probe cadence, or memory timeIntrinsic heatingEnvironment-bounded nonequilibrium response

Continue to Quantum-Matter Probes, Inference, and Evidence to map a detector signal to the correlation function it can constrain.

  • Bukov, Marin, Luca D’Alessio, and Anatoli Polkovnikov. “Universal High-Frequency Behavior of Periodically Driven Systems: From Dynamical Stabilization to Floquet Engineering.” Advances in Physics 64, 139–226 (2015). DOI.