Nonequilibrium, Driven, and Open Quantum Matter
Quenches, periodic drives, constraints, and environments give quantum matter several routes away from equilibrium. Their observable behavior depends on preparation and timescale as well as the Hamiltonian.
Enter this chapter
Section titled “Enter this chapter”Begin with Quenches and Relaxation in Lattice and Continuum Matter to distinguish dephasing, local relaxation, and prethermal evolution after a quench.
Helpful background. Quenches and Relaxation in Lattice and Continuum Matter and Equilibration, Thermalization, and Dephasing develop the definitions used by the chapter’s opening pages.
Topics
Section titled “Topics”- Quenches and Relaxation in Lattice and Continuum Matter — How do quench protocol, conserved quantities, spectra, and observable choice distinguish dephasing, prethermalization, equilibration, and thermalization in a model?
- Kibble–Zurek Scaling and Defect Production — How does a finite-rate ramp through a quantum critical region set freeze-out scales and defect production?
- Nonthermal Fixed-Point Realizations in Quantum Matter — Which model and platform observables establish self-similar approach to a nonthermal fixed point rather than transient redistribution?
- Floquet Engineering in Quantum Matter — How can periodic driving engineer a useful quantum-matter Hamiltonian within a controlled prethermal window?
- Floquet Phases and Discrete Time Crystals — Which eigenstate, response, rigidity, lifetime, and thermodynamic criteria define Floquet phases and discrete time crystals?
- Quantum-Scar Models and Exceptional Eigenstates — How do quantum-scar models produce exceptional nonthermal eigenstates and revivals inside an otherwise thermal spectrum?
- Hilbert-Space Fragmentation and Constrained Dynamics — How do kinetic constraints split Hilbert space into invariant sectors, and which observables distinguish fragmentation from symmetry sectors, scars, or localization?
- Driven-Dissipative Condensate, Cavity, and Circuit Matter — How do coherent drive, loss, measurement, and interaction create steady states and transitions in condensate, cavity, circuit, and programmable matter?
- Dynamical Phase Transitions and Loschmidt Diagnostics — What do nonanalytic Loschmidt-rate functions or dynamical order parameters establish, and how are they related—or not—to equilibrium phases?
- Heating, Finite Size, and Open-System Evidence — How are heating, prethermal plateaus, recurrences, loss, bath memory, and measurement backaction separated in nonequilibrium quantum-matter evidence?
How the ideas fit together
Section titled “How the ideas fit together”A high-frequency drive can produce an effective Hamiltonian over a long prethermal interval while still causing heating at later times. Micromotion and the observation protocol are part of that effective description Bukov, D’Alessio, and Polkovnikov 2015, §§ 2–3.
Constraints, scars, and fragmentation can preserve memory by different mechanisms, while baths introduce loss and noise. Similar revivals or slow relaxation therefore do not identify one mechanism. Compare the signal’s time window with heating, recurrence, and environmental times before interpreting temporal order or a stationary phase.
The comparison below separates the assumptions and tests needed for these different conclusions.
Regime comparison
Section titled “Regime comparison”| Regime | Protocol and controlling object | Primary observable | Expected lifetime or size trend | Main alternative | Strongest bounded claim |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dephasing | Sudden quench; post-quench energy gaps | Local correlator or imbalance | Stationary fluctuations shrink with effective dimension; recurrences move with size | Coarse time resolution | Observable equilibrates over a declared window |
| Kibble–Zurek production | Critical ramp; and | Defect density or correlation length | Power law in ramp time, then finite-size saturation | Post-ramp coarsening | Freeze-out scaling in an independently fixed critical window |
| Nonthermal fixed point | Far-from-equilibrium quench; scaling function | collapse and transported invariant | Scaling range widens before infrared or ultraviolet cutoff | Transient redistribution or imaging convolution | Finite-window self-similar dynamics |
| Floquet engineering | Periodic drive; plus micromotion | Held-out stroboscopic and intraperiod observables | Error decreases with expansion order until resonances or noise dominate | Calibrated single-particle dressing only | Engineered dynamics within a prethermal window |
| Discrete time crystal | Periodic drive; quasienergy pairing or prethermal symmetry breaking | Rigid subharmonic correlations | Lifetime grows with size or drive frequency according to mechanism | Beat note, synchronization, or recurrence | Robust finite-window temporal order |
| Many-body scars | Special quench; exceptional spectral tower | State-selective fidelity and local revival | Tower reconstruction and perturbation trend persist with size | Accidental commensurability | Scar-enhanced revival dynamics in a specified model |
| Hilbert-space fragmentation | Kinetic constraint; Krylov connectivity graph | Sector participation and memory | Exact sectors remain disconnected; weak breaking gives coupling-dependent leakage | Disorder localization or slow energetics | Fragment-resolved dynamics or a prefragmented window |
| Driven-dissipative criticality | Coherent drive and loss; Liouvillian | Output correlations and relaxation gap | Gap closes only in a declared large-system or large-occupation limit | Finite-system switching | Metastability or open critical scaling, as tested |
| Loschmidt transition | Global quench; return-rate Fisher zeros | Return probability and critical-time scaling | Rounding sharpens with size | Smooth local crossover | Dynamical return-rate criticality |
| Bath- or measurement-limited behavior | Drive or quench plus environment; channel or memory kernel | Unconditional and conditional records | Rate follows bath coupling, probe cadence, or memory time | Intrinsic heating | Environment-bounded nonequilibrium response |
Where to go next
Section titled “Where to go next”Continue to Quantum-Matter Probes, Inference, and Evidence to map a detector signal to the correlation function it can constrain.
References
Section titled “References”- Bukov, Marin, Luca D’Alessio, and Anatoli Polkovnikov. “Universal High-Frequency Behavior of Periodically Driven Systems: From Dynamical Stabilization to Floquet Engineering.” Advances in Physics 64, 139–226 (2015). DOI.