Skip to content

Lattice Gauge Theory

Group-valued link variables allow a lattice gauge theory to retain local gauge symmetry at finite spacing. This chapter connects parallel transport to the Wilson action and to physical loop observables, then distinguishes gauge fixing, strong-coupling expansions, topology, and smoothing by gradient flow.

Begin with Links, Plaquettes, and Gauge Invariance to derive link and plaquette transformations before choosing an action.

  1. Links, Plaquettes, and Gauge Invariance — Constructs parallel transport with consistent orientation.
  2. The Wilson Gauge Action and Its Continuum Limit — Recovers the continuum gauge kinetic term.
  3. Gauge Fixing, Gribov Copies, and Gauge-Dependent Correlators — Tracks the gauge-copy prescription of nonphysical correlators.
  4. Wilson and Polyakov Loops, Static Energies, and Screening Diagnostics — Distinguishes static energies, thermal probes, and screening.
  5. Gauge Ensembles and Renormalized Observables — Connects ensemble measurements to renormalized quantities.
  6. Strong-Coupling and Character Expansions — Uses character expansions in their convergence regime.
  7. Topology and Lattice Index Diagnostics — Compares lattice charge and index definitions.
  8. Gradient Flow, Flow Scales, and Renormalized Gauge Observables — Separates smoothing scales from cutoff and physical scales.

A link transforms at its two endpoints, so a traced closed product is gauge invariant. This gives both the plaquette action and extended probes of gauge dynamics. Gauge invariance, however, does not equate their physical meanings: a rectangular Wilson loop extracts a static energy only after a long-time projection, and screening can change its large-distance behavior. Positive flow time introduces another scale rather than taking the continuum limit. Wilson 1974, pp. 2445–2459. The table keeps these distinctions explicit.

ItemDefinition to recordA decisive checkFailure if omitted
Gauge dataGG, global form, representation, TRT_RTranslate one known Casimir or group integralCouplings and loop normalizations disagree
LinksEndpoint-to-base transport with Uμ(x)≃e−iagAμU_\mu(x)\simeq e^{-iagA_\mu}Reverse a link and obtain U−1U^{-1}Paths fail to compose consistently
Plaquettes and actionOrdered boundary and coefficient of 1−Re⁡tr⁡Up/N1-\operatorname{Re}\operatorname{tr}U_p/NRecover 14FμνaFμνa\frac14F^a_{\mu\nu}F^a_{\mu\nu}Wrong sign or factor in the continuum action
Gauge fixingFunctional, residual group, copy selection, toleranceRepeat from several gauge transformsAlgorithmic representative is mistaken for a unique gauge
Loop observableRepresentation, contour, smearing, subtractionReverse orientation and complex conjugateStatic energy contains an unidentified self energy
TopologyCharge definition, admissibility or smoothing, volumeCompare independent definitions toward a=0a=0Dislocations are counted as physical sectors
FlowIntegrator, t/a2t/a^2, smoothing radius, discretizationStep-size refinement and a2≪t≪L2a^2\ll t\ll L^2Smoothing dependence is mislabeled renormalization
Final quantityScale, scheme, covariance, limit orderLeave-one-spacing-out and volume stabilityA bare finite-lattice number is labeled physical

Continue to Lattice Fermions and Chirality to locate the extra zeros of the naive lattice Dirac operator.

  • Wilson, K. G. (1974). Confinement of quarks. Physical Review D, 10, 2445–2459. DOI.