Skip to content

Sigma-Model Instantons and Topological Charge

The previous page explained why a continuous order parameter is fragile in two dimensions. The O(3)O(3) nonlinear sigma model has no ordinary long-range Néel order in infinite two-dimensional Euclidean spacetime. But the model still has something rigid: topology. Localized configurations with a fixed value at infinity are maps from a compactified spacetime sphere to a target sphere, and such maps fall into disconnected integer-labeled sectors.

Those sectors are invisible in perturbation theory around a constant field. A small fluctuation cannot change how many times the spacetime sphere wraps the target sphere. The nontrivial sectors are represented by finite-action Euclidean saddle points called instantons. In the O(3)O(3) model they are especially beautiful: the action satisfies a topological lower bound,

S04πα0Q,S_0\ge {4\pi\over \alpha_0}|Q|,

and the configurations that saturate the bound are holomorphic maps between two Riemann spheres. This page builds that statement from scratch.

Required background. Nonlinear sigma models and constraints supplies the O(3)O(3) action and target-space geometry.

Helpful background. Spin chains and theta terms motivates the theta angle, while symmetry restoration explains why topology remains informative even without a local order parameter.

Normalization for this page. We work in two Euclidean dimensions with coordinates x1,x2x^1,x^2 and

ϵ12=+1,z=x1+ix2,z=12(1i2),zˉ=12(1+i2).\epsilon_{12}=+1, \qquad z=x^1+ix^2, \qquad \partial_z={1\over2}(\partial_1-i\partial_2), \qquad \partial_{\bar z}={1\over2}(\partial_1+i\partial_2).

The O(3)O(3) nonlinear sigma model is

S0[n]=12α0d2xμnμn,n2=1.S_0[\mathbf n] ={1\over2\alpha_0}\int d^2x\,\partial_\mu\mathbf n\cdot\partial_\mu\mathbf n, \qquad \mathbf n^2=1.

The topological charge is

Q[n]=18πd2xϵμνn(μn×νn).Q[\mathbf n] ={1\over8\pi}\int d^2x\,\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\, \mathbf n\cdot(\partial_\mu\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n).

With these signs, holomorphic w(z)w(z) configurations below have Q>0Q>0 and action S0=4πQ/α0S_0=4\pi Q/\alpha_0.

A localized instanton has finite Euclidean action, so its gradients die sufficiently fast at infinity:

x1d2x(μn)2<.\int_{|x|\gg1} d^2x\,(\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2<\infty.

For the sector decomposition on the plane, we also impose the standard vacuum boundary condition

n(x)nas x.\mathbf n(x)\longrightarrow \mathbf n_\infty \qquad \text{as } |x|\to\infty.

The distinction matters: finite Dirichlet energy by itself need not force an arbitrary off-shell field to have a unique pointwise limit at infinity. The compactification argument applies to the localized configuration space with the boundary condition above, which includes the smooth instanton saddles studied here.

The point at infinity can therefore be added to the Euclidean plane. Topologically,

R2{}S2.\mathbb R^2\cup\{\infty\}\simeq S^2.

Since the target space is also S2S^2, a localized field with this boundary condition is a map

n:Sspacetime2Starget2.\mathbf n:S^2_{\rm spacetime}\longrightarrow S^2_{\rm target}.

Such maps are classified by the homotopy group

π2(S2)=Z.\pi_2(S^2)=\mathbb Z.

The integer is the degree of the map: how many times the domain sphere covers the target sphere, counted with orientation.

Compactifying the Euclidean plane and mapping the domain sphere to the target sphere

The localized boundary condition makes every direction at Euclidean infinity approach one target point. Thus the plane compactifies to S2S^2, and the field becomes a map S2S2S^2\to S^2 with integer degree QQ.

This is already a major difference from ordinary perturbation theory. Around the trivial vacuum, one writes

n=(1π2,π),\mathbf n=(\sqrt{1-\boldsymbol\pi^2},\boldsymbol\pi),

and expands in small π\boldsymbol\pi. Such fields live inside one coordinate patch of the target sphere and have Q=0Q=0. No finite-order perturbative diagram can see a configuration that wraps the entire target.

The same global idea is easiest to see one dimension lower. Let t[0,1]t\in[0,1] parametrize a circle by identifying its endpoints, and consider a map to a target circle,

U(t)=eiφ(t).U(t)=e^{i\varphi(t)}.

Continuity of UU requires only

φ(1)φ(0)=2πk,kZ,\varphi(1)-\varphi(0)=2\pi k, \qquad k\in\mathbb Z,

because φ\varphi is an angular coordinate. Its winding number is

k=12π01dtdφdt.k={1\over2\pi}\int_0^1dt\,{d\varphi\over dt}.

The integrand is locally a derivative, yet the integral need not vanish because φ\varphi need not be a single-valued real function on the circle. The S2S2S^2\to S^2 charge below is the two-dimensional version of this distinction between a local coordinate formula and global topology.

The formula for QQ becomes transparent in target spherical coordinates. Write

n=(sinΘcosΦ,sinΘsinΦ,cosΘ).\mathbf n=(\sin\Theta\cos\Phi,\sin\Theta\sin\Phi,\cos\Theta).

A short calculation gives

n(μn×νn)=sinΘ(μΘνΦνΘμΦ).\mathbf n\cdot(\partial_\mu\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n) =\sin\Theta\,(\partial_\mu\Theta\,\partial_\nu\Phi-\partial_\nu\Theta\,\partial_\mu\Phi).

Therefore

Q=14πd2xsinΘ(1Θ2Φ2Θ1Φ).Q ={1\over4\pi}\int d^2x\, \sin\Theta\,(\partial_1\Theta\,\partial_2\Phi-\partial_2\Theta\,\partial_1\Phi).

Equivalently,

Q=14πsinΘdΘdΦ.Q={1\over4\pi}\int \sin\Theta\,d\Theta\wedge d\Phi.

The two-form

ω=14πsinΘdΘdΦ\omega={1\over4\pi}\sin\Theta\,d\Theta\wedge d\Phi

is the normalized area form on the target sphere:

S2ω=1.\int_{S^2}\omega=1.

The expression for QQ is the integral of the pullback of this area form to the domain sphere. A map that covers the target once with positive orientation has Q=1Q=1; one that covers it once with reversed orientation has Q=1Q=-1; a map covering it kk times has Q=kQ=k.

As a check, take the identity map from the domain sphere with angles (ϑ,φ)(\vartheta,\varphi) to the target sphere,

Θ=ϑ,Φ=φ.\Theta=\vartheta, \qquad \Phi=\varphi.

Then

Q=14π0πdϑ02πdφsinϑ=1.Q={1\over4\pi}\int_0^\pi d\vartheta\int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi\,\sin\vartheta=1.

The integral is integer-valued for smooth localized configurations with the stated boundary condition, but the density is not itself quantized. The topological charge is global: it knows how local oriented area elements fit together over the whole sphere.

A useful mental check is that QQ is stable under smooth deformations that preserve the boundary condition, but not under arbitrary singular ones. To change QQ, the field must become singular, change its value at infinity, or leave the target sphere. This is why perturbation theory around a smooth vacuum cannot move between sectors.

The theta term is locally a total derivative

Section titled “The theta term is locally a total derivative”

The topological density may be written locally as a total derivative. In the spherical patch that excludes the south pole,

q(x)=14πϵμνsinΘμΘνΦ=14πϵμνμ[(1cosΘ)νΦ],q(x) ={1\over4\pi}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\sin\Theta\,\partial_\mu\Theta\,\partial_\nu\Phi ={1\over4\pi}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\left[(1-\cos\Theta)\partial_\nu\Phi\right],

where

Q=d2xq(x).Q=\int d^2x\,q(x).

This formula explains why the theta term does not change the local classical equation of motion. The Euclidean path integral with theta angle is organized as

Z(θ)=QZeiθQQDneS0[n].Z(\theta)=\sum_{Q\in\mathbb Z} e^{i\theta Q}\int_{Q}\mathcal D\mathbf n\,e^{-S_0[\mathbf n]}.

Equivalently one writes the Euclidean action as

SE=S0iθQ.S_E=S_0-i\theta Q.

The variation of QQ under a smooth variation that keeps the boundary fixed is a boundary term, so the theta angle does not affect the local saddle-point equation. It does affect quantum physics because different topological sectors acquire different phases.

Because QZQ\in\mathbb Z on the compactified plane,

ei(θ+2π)Q=eiθQ,e^{i(\theta+2\pi)Q}=e^{i\theta Q},

and therefore Z(θ+2π)=Z(θ)Z(\theta+2\pi)=Z(\theta). This 2π2\pi periodicity is a global statement about the allowed sectors, not a consequence of the local Euler–Lagrange equation.

There is an important catch hidden in the word “locally.” The one-form

A=(1cosΘ)dΦA=(1-\cos\Theta)d\Phi

is not a globally regular one-form on the target sphere. It has the usual Dirac-string-type coordinate singularity of a monopole potential. The topological charge can be nonzero precisely because a globally smooth potential for the area form does not exist on S2S^2.

This is the sigma-model analogue of the Yang–Mills identity

tr(FF)=dCS3(A),\operatorname{tr}(F\wedge F)=d\,\mathrm{CS}_3(A),

where the density is locally a derivative but the integral over compactified spacetime can be an integer.

The practical lesson is: a total derivative can matter when the path integral sums over topologically nontrivial sectors. Dropping the theta term because it does not change the local Euler–Lagrange equation would erase precisely the physics this page is about.

The action is not merely bounded below by zero; within a fixed topological sector it is bounded below by the winding number. Use n2=1\mathbf n^2=1, so nμn=0\mathbf n\cdot\partial_\mu\mathbf n=0. Then

(n×μn)2=(μn)2.(\mathbf n\times\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2=(\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2.

Consider the square

(μn+ϵμνn×νn)2.\left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\,\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2.

After summing over μ=1,2\mu=1,2,

d2x(μn+ϵμνn×νn)2=2d2x(μn)216πQ.\int d^2x\, \left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2 =2\int d^2x\,(\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2-16\pi Q.

Therefore

S0=14α0d2x(μn+ϵμνn×νn)2+4πα0Q.S_0 ={1\over4\alpha_0}\int d^2x\, \left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2 +{4\pi\over\alpha_0}Q.

Similarly,

S0=14α0d2x(μnϵμνn×νn)24πα0Q.S_0 ={1\over4\alpha_0}\int d^2x\, \left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n-\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2 -{4\pi\over\alpha_0}Q.

Since the square is nonnegative,

S04πα0Q.\boxed{ S_0\ge {4\pi\over\alpha_0}|Q|. }

Configurations saturating the bound satisfy the first-order equations

μn+ϵμνn×νn=0(Q>0),\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n=0 \qquad (Q>0),

or

μnϵμνn×νn=0(Q<0).\partial_\mu\mathbf n-\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n=0 \qquad (Q<0).

These are the self-dual and anti-self-dual equations for the sigma model. Since they saturate a lower bound in their topological sector, their solutions are automatically solutions of the second-order Euler–Lagrange equation

2n+(μnμn)n=0.\partial^2\mathbf n+(\partial_\mu\mathbf n\cdot\partial_\mu\mathbf n)\mathbf n=0.

Bogomolny completion of the O(3) sigma-model action

The two-derivative action can be written as a nonnegative square plus a topological term. Bound-saturating fields obey a first-order self-duality equation and have S0=4πQ/α0S_0=4\pi |Q|/\alpha_0.

The first-order equations are stronger than the ordinary field equation. This is why instantons are rare enough to be tractable, yet important enough to change the nonperturbative path integral.

CP¹ coordinates and holomorphic instantons

Section titled “CP¹ coordinates and holomorphic instantons”

The target sphere is also the Riemann sphere CP1\mathbb{CP}^1. Introduce the stereographic coordinate on the patch that omits the south pole,

w=tanΘ2eiΦ.w=\tan{\Theta\over2}\,e^{i\Phi}.

In terms of ww,

n=11+w2(w+wˉ,i(wwˉ),1w2).\mathbf n={1\over1+|w|^2}\left(w+\bar w,-i(w-\bar w),1-|w|^2\right).

The omitted target point is represented by w=w=\infty and is regular in the second coordinate u=1/wu=1/w. Consequently, a pole of a rational function w(z)w(z) is a coordinate pole, not a singularity of the physical unit vector n\mathbf n.

The round metric on the target sphere is

dndn=4dwdwˉ(1+w2)2.d\mathbf n\cdot d\mathbf n={4\,dw\,d\bar w\over(1+|w|^2)^2}.

Consequently the action is

S0=4α0d2xzwzˉwˉ+zˉwzwˉ(1+w2)2,S_0 ={4\over\alpha_0}\int d^2x\, {\partial_z w\,\partial_{\bar z}\bar w+\partial_{\bar z}w\,\partial_z\bar w\over(1+|w|^2)^2},

and the topological charge is

Q=1πd2xzwzˉwˉzˉwzwˉ(1+w2)2.Q ={1\over\pi}\int d^2x\, {\partial_z w\,\partial_{\bar z}\bar w-\partial_{\bar z}w\,\partial_z\bar w\over(1+|w|^2)^2}.

For a holomorphic map,

zˉw=0,\partial_{\bar z}w=0,

we get

S0=4πα0Q,Q0.S_0={4\pi\over\alpha_0}Q, \qquad Q\ge0.

For an anti-holomorphic map,

zw=0,\partial_z w=0,

we get

S0=4πα0Q,Q0.S_0={4\pi\over\alpha_0}|Q|, \qquad Q\le0.

Thus the instanton equation is just the Cauchy–Riemann equation in disguise. Instantons are holomorphic maps between Riemann spheres.

Since the boundary condition compactifies the domain to S2C{}S^2\simeq\mathbb C\cup\{\infty\}, a smooth holomorphic instanton is a rational function,

w(z)=P(z)R(z),w(z)={P(z)\over R(z)},

where PP and RR are polynomials with no common zero. Its degree is

Q=max(degP,degR).Q=\max(\deg P,\deg R).

A convenient degree-kk family, when the zeros and poles do not cancel, is

w(z)=Cj=1kzajzbj.w(z)=C\prod_{j=1}^k {z-a_j\over z-b_j}.

The points aja_j and bjb_j are not particles sitting in spacetime. They are moduli of the rational map: they specify where the map takes the regular target values w=0w=0 and w=w=\infty. Still, this zero–pole picture is a good way to remember how a multi-instanton map is assembled.

A rational map written in terms of zeros and poles represents a multi-instanton field

Holomorphic localized configurations are rational maps on the compactified complex plane. A degree-kk map has Q=kQ=k and may be represented by zeros aja_j and coordinate poles bjb_j of w(z)w(z).

This holomorphic description is special to the O(3)O(3) model. The general O(N)O(N) model has important topology in other dimensions and for other target spaces, but this clean rational-map solution relies on

S2CP1S^2\simeq\mathbb{CP}^1

and on two-dimensional conformal geometry.

The simplest instanton is

w(z)=eiχzz0ρ,w(z)=e^{i\chi}{z-z_0\over\rho},

where

z0=X1+iX2,ρ>0,χ[0,2π).z_0=X_1+iX_2, \qquad \rho>0, \qquad \chi\in[0,2\pi).

The real parameters have simple meanings:

  • z0z_0 is the center of the instanton;
  • ρ\rho is its size;
  • χ\chi is a residual target-space rotation around the boundary value.

This representative fixes the boundary value to w()=w(\infty)=\infty, or n=(0,0,1)\mathbf n_\infty=(0,0,-1). Let r=zz0r=|z-z_0|. Then

n3(r)=ρ2r2ρ2+r2,n^3(r)={\rho^2-r^2\over\rho^2+r^2},

so the center maps to the north pole, the circle r=ρr=\rho maps to the equator, and infinity maps to the south pole. The topological charge density is

q(r)=ρ2π(r2+ρ2)2,q(r)={\rho^2\over\pi(r^2+\rho^2)^2},

with

d2xq(r)=1.\int d^2x\,q(r)=1.

The Euclidean action density is

LE(r)=4ρ2α0(r2+ρ2)2,\mathcal L_E(r)={4\rho^2\over\alpha_0(r^2+\rho^2)^2},

and therefore

S0=4πα0.S_0={4\pi\over\alpha_0}.

The radial profile of the one-instanton and its localized topological charge density

For w=(zz0)/ρw=(z-z_0)/\rho, the target polar angle obeys tan(Θ/2)=r/ρ\tan(\Theta/2)=r/\rho. The size modulus ρ\rho sets where the profile crosses the target equator, but the total action remains 4π/α04\pi/\alpha_0 for every ρ\rho.

The independence of the classical action from ρ\rho is not an accident. The two-dimensional sigma model is classically scale invariant: under

xλx,x\mapsto \lambda x,

the measure d2xd^2x and the two derivatives in (n)2(\partial\mathbf n)^2 compensate exactly. The instanton can be large or small with the same classical cost.

Quantum mechanically the story is subtler. The coupling runs, so an RG-improved semiclassical estimate associates an instanton of size ρ\rho with a coupling evaluated near the momentum scale 1/ρ1/\rho:

e4π/α0e4π/α(1/ρ).e^{-4\pi/\alpha_0} \quad\leadsto\quad e^{-4\pi/\alpha(1/\rho)}.

The fluctuation determinant and collective-coordinate Jacobian supply additional powers of ρ\rho; the replacement above isolates only the running exponential. This is also where the O(3)O(3) model differs from a textbook double-well instanton. In quantum mechanics the instanton size is fixed by the potential. Here the classical two-dimensional action is scale invariant, so ρ\rho is a collective coordinate. The integration over ρ\rho is not a small technical detail; it tests the interface between semiclassics and the infrared strong-coupling region.

Small instantons are controlled by asymptotic freedom. Large instantons probe the strong-coupling infrared, where the model generates a mass scale. This is why instantons and the mass gap should not be mentally separated: the size integral forces the semiclassical saddle to talk to the RG.

The instanton action is proportional to 1/α01/\alpha_0:

Sinst=4πα0.S_{\rm inst}={4\pi\over\alpha_0}.

Its contribution to the Euclidean path integral is therefore of the form

exp(4πα0).\exp\left(-{4\pi\over\alpha_0}\right).

No Taylor series in α0\alpha_0 around α0=0\alpha_0=0 can produce such a term. Perturbation theory expands inside the Q=0Q=0 sector; including instanton saddles adds the disconnected Q0Q\ne0 sectors to the path integral. The small parameter is not a power of α0\alpha_0, but the exponentially small semiclassical weight.

For a dilute configuration of kk instantons and kˉ\bar k anti-instantons, the leading semiclassical weight has the schematic form

exp[4πα0(k+kˉ)+iθ(kkˉ)],\exp\left[-{4\pi\over\alpha_0}(k+\bar k)+i\theta(k-\bar k)\right],

before including the fluctuation determinants and interactions among collective coordinates. This formula is only schematic in the pure two-dimensional O(3)O(3) model because the scale modulus explores strong coupling at large ρ\rho. Still, it captures the essential lesson: topological sectors generate effects that are invisible in ordinary loop diagrams and carry theta-angle phases.

Localized configurations of the two-dimensional O(3)O(3) sigma model with a fixed value at infinity define maps

S2S2,S^2\to S^2,

and are classified by an integer degree QQ. The topological charge can be written as

Q=18πd2xϵμνn(μn×νn),Q={1\over8\pi}\int d^2x\,\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\, \mathbf n\cdot(\partial_\mu\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n),

or as the pullback of the normalized area form on the target sphere. It is locally a total derivative, so a theta term does not modify the local classical equations, but it changes the relative phases of topological sectors.

The action obeys the Bogomolny bound

S04πα0Q.S_0\ge {4\pi\over\alpha_0}|Q|.

The bound is saturated by first-order self-dual equations. In stereographic coordinates, the Q>0Q>0 solutions are holomorphic maps w=w(z)w=w(z), and compactness of the domain makes them rational functions. The one-instanton solution

w=eiχzz0ρw=e^{i\chi}{z-z_0\over\rho}

has action 4π/α04\pi/\alpha_0, charge 11, arbitrary center, arbitrary size, and a phase modulus. The size modulus is the doorway through which classical conformal invariance, asymptotic freedom, and infrared mass generation meet.

Inferring compactification from the action integral alone. The sector decomposition on R2\mathbb R^2 also uses a common limiting value n\mathbf n_\infty. With a physical boundary or nonconstant asymptotic data, the degree and theta term require extra boundary information.

Dropping a local total derivative. The topological density can be written as dAdA only patch by patch on the target sphere. Nonzero QQ is possible because the target area form is closed but not globally exact.

Treating a stereographic pole as a field singularity. The value w=w=\infty is an ordinary point of CP1\mathbb{CP}^1 and is covered by u=1/wu=1/w. A pole of w(z)w(z) can therefore be part of a perfectly smooth instanton.

Confusing instanton number with Noether charge. It is not generated by a continuous symmetry and does not count quanta. It is the degree of a map between compact oriented two-manifolds.

Assuming the size integral is automatically controlled. In the asymptotically free O(3)O(3) model, small instantons are semiclassical, but large instantons feel the strongly coupled infrared. A dilute-gas formula without an infrared analysis is only schematic.

Dropping the factor of two in QQ. Because ϵμν\epsilon_{\mu\nu} sums over both (1,2)(1,2) and (2,1)(2,1),

18πϵμνn(μn×νn)=14πn(1n×2n).{1\over8\pi}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\cdot(\partial_\mu\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n) ={1\over4\pi}\mathbf n\cdot(\partial_1\mathbf n\times\partial_2\mathbf n).

Exercise 1: the local total-derivative formula

Section titled “Exercise 1: the local total-derivative formula”

Show that the topological charge density is locally a total derivative in target spherical coordinates:

q(x)=14πϵμνsinΘμΘνΦ=14πϵμνμ[(1cosΘ)νΦ].q(x)={1\over4\pi}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\sin\Theta\,\partial_\mu\Theta\,\partial_\nu\Phi ={1\over4\pi}\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\left[(1-\cos\Theta)\partial_\nu\Phi\right].

Explain why this does not imply Q=0Q=0 for every smooth map.

Solution

Compute

μ[(1cosΘ)νΦ]=sinΘμΘνΦ+(1cosΘ)μνΦ.\partial_\mu\left[(1-\cos\Theta)\partial_\nu\Phi\right] =\sin\Theta\,\partial_\mu\Theta\,\partial_\nu\Phi +(1-\cos\Theta)\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\Phi.

Contract with ϵμν\epsilon_{\mu\nu}. The second term vanishes because μνΦ\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\Phi is symmetric in μ,ν\mu,\nu away from coordinate singularities, while ϵμν\epsilon_{\mu\nu} is antisymmetric. Thus

ϵμνμ[(1cosΘ)νΦ]=ϵμνsinΘμΘνΦ.\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\left[(1-\cos\Theta)\partial_\nu\Phi\right] =\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\sin\Theta\,\partial_\mu\Theta\,\partial_\nu\Phi.

This is only a local expression because Φ\Phi is not a globally smooth coordinate on S2S^2, and the one-form (1cosΘ)dΦ(1-\cos\Theta)d\Phi is singular in the usual polar coordinate patch. A nonzero integral comes from the need to patch together local potentials on the target sphere. Equivalently, the normalized area form on S2S^2 is closed but not globally exact.

Derive the Bogomolny bound

S04πα0QS_0\ge {4\pi\over\alpha_0}|Q|

from the nonnegative square

(μn+ϵμνn×νn)2.\left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2.
Solution

Using n2=1\mathbf n^2=1, we have nμn=0\mathbf n\cdot\partial_\mu\mathbf n=0, and therefore

(n×μn)2=(μn)2.(\mathbf n\times\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2=(\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2.

Now expand the square and sum over μ\mu:

(μn+ϵμνn×νn)2=2(μn)2+2ϵμνμn(n×νn).\left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2 =2(\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2 +2\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu\mathbf n\cdot(\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n).

The mixed product is

μn(n×νn)=n(μn×νn).\partial_\mu\mathbf n\cdot(\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n) =-\mathbf n\cdot(\partial_\mu\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n).

Thus

d2x(μn+ϵμνn×νn)2=2d2x(μn)216πQ.\int d^2x\, \left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2 =2\int d^2x\,(\partial_\mu\mathbf n)^2-16\pi Q.

Rearranging gives

S0=14α0d2x(μn+ϵμνn×νn)2+4πα0Q.S_0={1\over4\alpha_0}\int d^2x\, \left(\partial_\mu\mathbf n+\epsilon_{\mu\nu}\mathbf n\times\partial_\nu\mathbf n\right)^2 +{4\pi\over\alpha_0}Q.

For Q>0Q>0, the square is nonnegative, so S04πQ/α0S_0\ge4\pi Q/\alpha_0. Repeating the derivation with the opposite sign gives S04πQ/α0S_0\ge -4\pi Q/\alpha_0 for Q<0Q<0. Combining the two cases yields

S04πα0Q.S_0\ge {4\pi\over\alpha_0}|Q|.

For the one-instanton

w(z)=zρ,w(z)={z\over\rho},

show that

q(r)=ρ2π(r2+ρ2)2,q(r)={\rho^2\over\pi(r^2+\rho^2)^2},

and verify that Q=1Q=1.

Solution

For a holomorphic configuration,

q(x)=1πzwzˉwˉ(1+w2)2.q(x)={1\over\pi}{\partial_z w\,\partial_{\bar z}\bar w\over(1+|w|^2)^2}.

For w=z/ρw=z/\rho,

zw=1ρ,zˉwˉ=1ρ,w2=r2ρ2.\partial_z w={1\over\rho}, \qquad \partial_{\bar z}\bar w={1\over\rho}, \qquad |w|^2={r^2\over\rho^2}.

Therefore

q(r)=1π1/ρ2(1+r2/ρ2)2=ρ2π(r2+ρ2)2.q(r) ={1\over\pi}{1/\rho^2\over(1+r^2/\rho^2)^2} ={\rho^2\over\pi(r^2+\rho^2)^2}.

Integrating in polar coordinates,

Q=d2xq(r)=2π0rdrρ2π(r2+ρ2)2=2ρ20rdr(r2+ρ2)2.Q=\int d^2x\,q(r) =2\pi\int_0^\infty r\,dr\,{\rho^2\over\pi(r^2+\rho^2)^2} =2\rho^2\int_0^\infty {r\,dr\over(r^2+\rho^2)^2}.

Let u=r2+ρ2u=r^2+\rho^2, so du=2rdrdu=2r\,dr. Then

Q=ρ2ρ2duu2=1.Q=\rho^2\int_{\rho^2}^{\infty}{du\over u^2}=1.

Let

w(z)=(zρ)k,kZ>0.w(z)=\left({z\over\rho}\right)^k, \qquad k\in\mathbb Z_{>0}.

Use the fact that holomorphic maps saturate the Bogomolny bound to determine QQ and S0S_0. Give a geometric interpretation.

Solution

The function w(z)=(z/ρ)kw(z)=(z/\rho)^k is a degree-kk holomorphic map from the Riemann sphere to itself. A generic point in the target has kk preimages in the domain, counted with multiplicity. Hence

Q=k.Q=k.

Because the map is holomorphic, it saturates the Bogomolny bound, so

S0=4πkα0.S_0={4\pi k\over\alpha_0}.

Geometrically, the compactified Euclidean plane wraps the target sphere kk times with positive orientation. The map is not a collection of kk well-separated lumps for all moduli choices; it is a particularly symmetric degree-kk representative.

Exercise 5: stereographic poles are regular target points

Section titled “Exercise 5: stereographic poles are regular target points”

Consider the rational map

w(z)=ρzz0.w(z)={\rho\over z-z_0}.

Show that the apparent pole at z=z0z=z_0 is not a singularity of n\mathbf n, determine its degree and topological charge, and identify the target value at the pole.

Solution

Near z=z0z=z_0, use the second target coordinate

u=1w=zz0ρ.u={1\over w}={z-z_0\over\rho}.

This coordinate is smooth and vanishes at z=z0z=z_0, so the map has no physical singularity there. In the unit-vector formula, w|w|\to\infty gives

n(0,0,1),\mathbf n\longrightarrow(0,0,-1),

the south pole of the target sphere. The rational map has numerator degree 00 and denominator degree 11, hence

Q=deg(w)=1.Q=\deg(w)=1.

It is holomorphic as a map between Riemann spheres, even though one coordinate representation is meromorphic on the finite complex plane.

  • Belavin, Alexander A., and Alexander M. Polyakov. “Metastable States of Two-Dimensional Isotropic Ferromagnets.” JETP Letters 22, no. 10 (1975): 245–247; Russian original, Pis’ma v ZhETF 22 (1975): 503–506.
  • Coleman, Sidney. Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • Fradkin, Eduardo. Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • Polyakov, Alexander M. Gauge Fields and Strings. Contemporary Concepts in Physics, Vol. 3. Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987.
  • Zinn-Justin, Jean. Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena. 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2021.