Skip to content

Strings, Branes, Sigma Models, and AdS Hints

Particles, strings, and branes can all be described by summing over their histories in a path integral. A particle sweeps out a worldline, a string sweeps out a worldsheet, and a pp-brane sweeps out a (p+1)(p+1)-dimensional worldvolume. This common viewpoint connects confining flux tubes to the Polyakov string, worldsheet anomalies to target-space field equations, and the string’s Liouville or radial direction to scale.

The same questions reappear at every dimension: What is the geometric action? What are the gauge redundancies on the worldvolume? Which background fields couple to the object? What does renormalization on the worldvolume mean for spacetime physics?

This page is a synthesis, not a complete string theory course in miniature. The goal is to connect the course’s earlier ideas—Wilson loops, defects, conformal invariance, anomalies, sigma models, and RG—to the language of strings, branes, and holographic geometry.

Required background. Wilson loops, worldlines, monopole plasma, and confinement supplies the surface representation of a confining Wilson loop. Worldlines, worldsheets, and reparametrization gauge supplies the geometric actions and gauge redundancies used here.

Helpful background. Conformal anomalies, Liouville action, and nonlocal effective actions develops the anomaly that makes the conformal factor dynamical.

The particle path integral gives the prototype. A scalar particle propagator may be represented schematically as

G(x,y)γ:xyemL(γ),G(x,y)\sim \sum_{\gamma:x\to y} e^{-mL(\gamma)},

where L(γ)L(\gamma) is the length of the path. This is not just a calculational trick. It says that the quantum object is described by summing over all possible histories, with a geometric action suppressing long histories.

A confining Wilson loop suggests the next step. If a loop CC bounds an electric flux tube, the low-energy contribution is not a path but a surface Σ\Sigma with boundary Σ=C\partial\Sigma=C:

W(C)Σ:Σ=CeTsA(Σ).W(C)\sim \sum_{\Sigma:\,\partial\Sigma=C}e^{-T_sA(\Sigma)}.

Here A(Σ)A(\Sigma) is the area and TsT_s is an effective string tension. In a strongly coupled lattice gauge theory this formula appears directly: the Wilson loop is saturated by plaquette surfaces. In a continuum confining theory it becomes an effective description of the flux tube.

Particle paths and Wilson-loop surface sums

A particle propagator sums over paths, while a confining Wilson loop suggests a sum over surfaces ending on the loop. This is the conceptual bridge from worldlines to worldsheets.

There is an immediate energy–entropy lesson, familiar from the Ising model at the beginning of the course. Suppose the number of lattice surfaces of area AA grows like

N(A)es0A.N(A)\sim e^{s_0A}.

If every surface has bare weight eT0Ae^{-T_0A}, then the combined statistical weight behaves like

N(A)eT0Ae(T0s0)A.N(A)e^{-T_0A}\sim e^{-(T_0-s_0)A}.

Thus the physical or renormalized string tension is roughly

Teff=T0s0.T_{\rm eff}=T_0-s_0.

When TeffT_{\rm eff} is large, surfaces are microscopic and rigid. When TeffT_{\rm eff} is tuned toward zero, large fluctuating surfaces dominate. That tuning is the string analog of approaching a critical point. The continuum string is not a single smooth surface chosen by hand; it is a critical limit of a sum over fluctuating surfaces.

The same ladder can be organized by the spatial dimension pp of the object whose history is summed over. A pointlike instanton is inserted at a Euclidean event and is sometimes called a p=1p=-1 brane. A particle is a p=0p=0 object and sweeps out a line; a string is a p=1p=1 object and sweeps out a surface; a general pp-brane sweeps out a (p+1)(p+1)-dimensional worldvolume.

The geometric action for a relativistic pp-brane is the volume of its worldvolume:

Sp[X]=Tpdp+1ξdethab,S_p[X]=T_p\int d^{p+1}\xi\sqrt{\det h_{ab}},

where

hab=aXmbXnGmn(X)h_{ab}=\partial_aX^m\partial_bX^nG_{mn}(X)

is the induced metric. The cases p=0p=0 and p=1p=1 give

S0=mds,S1=Tsd2ξdeth.S_0=m\int ds, \qquad S_1=T_s\int d^2\xi\sqrt{\det h}.

The p=1p=1 case is the Nambu–Goto action for a string. It measures the area of the embedded worldsheet.

Objects organized by worldvolume dimension and geometric weight

The same path-integral idea repeats in increasing dimension: local events, worldlines, worldsheets, and higher branes are weighted by geometric actions and by their couplings to background gauge fields.

Extended objects also couple naturally to differential-form gauge fields. A charged particle couples to a one-form AA through

SE,int=iqγA.S_{E,\rm int}=-iq\int_\gamma A.

A string can couple to a two-form BB through

SE,B=iqΣB,S_{E,B}=-iq\int_\Sigma B,

and a pp-brane couples to a (p+1)(p+1)-form potential Cp+1C_{p+1} through

SE,WZ=iqWp+1Cp+1.S_{E,\rm WZ}=-iq\int_{W_{p+1}}C_{p+1}.

This is the natural generalization of the Wilson-line phase. An electrically charged pp-brane couples to a (p+1)(p+1)-form potential, while the Hodge-dual field strength measures the corresponding magnetic charge. The topology of these electric and magnetic couplings underlies generalized Dirac quantization and the relation among monopoles, vortices, and branes.

The Nambu–Goto action is geometrically transparent but technically inconvenient because of the square root. The Polyakov trick introduces an independent worldsheet metric gabg_{ab}:

SP[X,g]=Ts2d2ξggabaXmbXnGmn(X).S_P[X,g]={T_s\over2}\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\,g^{ab}\partial_aX^m\partial_bX^nG_{mn}(X).

For a flat target and Ts=1/(2πα)T_s=1/(2\pi\alpha'), this becomes

SP[X,g]=14παd2ξggabaXμbXμ.S_P[X,g]={1\over4\pi\alpha'}\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\,g^{ab}\partial_aX^\mu\partial_bX_\mu.

Classically, varying gabg_{ab} gives the worldsheet stress-tensor constraint

Tab=aXbX12gabgcdcXdX=0.T_{ab}=\partial_aX\cdot\partial_bX-{1\over2}g_{ab}g^{cd}\partial_cX\cdot\partial_dX=0.

When the induced metric is nondegenerate, solving this constraint sets gabg_{ab} equal to the induced metric up to a Weyl factor and returns the Nambu–Goto area action.

The Polyakov form has a larger gauge redundancy:

ξaξa(ξ),gabe2ω(ξ)gab.\xi^a\mapsto \xi'^a(\xi), \qquad g_{ab}\mapsto e^{2\omega(\xi)}g_{ab}.

The first is worldsheet diffeomorphism invariance; the second is Weyl invariance. Locally in two dimensions one can use them to set

gab=e2ωg^ab.g_{ab}=e^{2\omega}\hat g_{ab}.

Classically the conformal factor ω\omega drops out of the kinetic action. Quantum mechanically it need not drop out, because the functional measure is anomalous. The matter fields XμX^\mu contribute central charge c=Dc=D, while the diffeomorphism ghosts contribute

cgh=26.c_{\rm gh}=-26.

Thus a bosonic string in flat space is Weyl invariant without an extra Liouville dynamics only when

D26=0.D-26=0.

Away from criticality, the conformal factor becomes a genuine field. After a field redefinition to a canonically normalized Liouville field χ\chi, its action has the schematic form

SL[χ]=14πd2ξg^[(^χ)2+QR^χ+4πμe2bχ].S_L[\chi]={1\over4\pi}\int d^2\xi\sqrt{\hat g}\, \left[(\hat\nabla\chi)^2+Q\hat R\chi +4\pi\mu e^{2b\chi}\right].

The sign and the parameters QQ and bb depend on the central-charge deficit and on conventions; in the common spacelike normalization, cL=1+6Q2c_L=1+6Q^2. Quantum consistency requires the full matter, ghost, and Liouville central charges to cancel,

cmatter+cgh+cL=0,c_{\rm matter}+c_{\rm gh}+c_L=0,

not merely D26=0D-26=0 after Liouville dynamics is included. The structural point is that the scale of the worldsheet metric becomes an additional dynamical coordinate. In noncritical string theory, one often interprets this Liouville coordinate as an emergent target-space direction.

Polyakov action, conformal gauge, and Liouville mode

The Nambu–Goto action may be rewritten using an independent worldsheet metric. After conformal gauge fixing, the Weyl factor is pure gauge classically but becomes the Liouville mode when the matter-plus-ghost central charge does not vanish.

This is one of the deepest uses of two-dimensional CFT in physics. The same anomaly that produced the Schwarzian term and the Virasoro central charge now controls the consistency of a fluctuating geometry.

The flat-space string action is only the first term in a much broader two-dimensional field theory. A general bosonic sigma model has target-space fields as couplings:

SΣ=14παd2ξggabGmn(Y)aYmbYn+i4παBmn(Y)dYmdYnS_\Sigma={1\over4\pi\alpha'}\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\, g^{ab}G_{mn}(Y)\partial_aY^m\partial_bY^n +{i\over4\pi\alpha'}\int B_{mn}(Y)dY^m\wedge dY^n +14πd2ξgΦ(Y)R(2)+d2ξgT(Y)+.\hspace{3.2cm} +{1\over4\pi}\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\,\Phi(Y)R^{(2)} +\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\,T(Y)+\cdots.

The target-space metric GmnG_{mn}, two-form BmnB_{mn}, dilaton Φ\Phi, and tachyon or scalar source TT are not merely external decorations. From the worldsheet perspective they are coupling functions. Therefore they run under the two-dimensional RG.

Worldsheet sigma model with target-space background fields

A string moving in a background sees target-space fields as worldsheet couplings. Requiring Weyl invariance constrains the allowed backgrounds.

This is a stunning reversal of viewpoint. In ordinary QFT, beta functions tell us how couplings depend on scale. In string theory, the beta functions of a two-dimensional QFT become equations of motion for spacetime fields.

To see the seed of this idea, recall the nonlinear sigma model with n2=1n^2=1:

S=12αd2ξanan,nSN1.S={1\over2\alpha}\int d^2\xi\,\partial_an\cdot\partial_an, \qquad n\in S^{N-1}.

With \ell a length scale, the one-loop running coupling is

dαdlog=N22πα2+O(α3).{d\alpha\over d\log\ell}={N-2\over2\pi}\alpha^2+O(\alpha^3).

Equivalently, with μ=1/\mu=1/\ell,

μdαdμ=N22πα2+O(α3).\mu{d\alpha\over d\mu}=-{N-2\over2\pi}\alpha^2+O(\alpha^3).

For N>2N>2, the model is weakly coupled at short distances and strongly coupled at long distances. The one-loop coefficient is proportional to the Ricci curvature of the target sphere. More generally, define the metric beta function with respect to the energy scale μ\mu by

βmnGμdGmndμ=αRmn+O(α2)\beta^G_{mn}\equiv\mu{dG_{mn}\over d\mu} =\alpha' R_{mn}+O(\alpha'^2)

in a common convention. In terms of the length scale =1/μ\ell=1/\mu, this is dGmn/dlog=αRmn+dG_{mn}/d\log\ell=-\alpha'R_{mn}+\cdots, the Ricci-flow sign often used in geometry. Including the dilaton and setting B=0B=0, the leading condition for Weyl invariance is schematically

Rmn+2mnΦ+O(α)=0.\boxed{ R_{mn}+2\nabla_m\nabla_n\Phi+O(\alpha')=0. }

The same equation follows from varying the target-space effective action

SeffdDYGe2Φ(R+4(Φ)2+).S_{\rm eff}\sim\int d^DY\sqrt G\,e^{-2\Phi} \left(R+4(\nabla\Phi)^2+\cdots\right).

Thus a two-dimensional quantum anomaly has become a target-space gravitational equation.

Worldsheet RG becomes target-space geometry

The leading metric beta function of a sigma model is controlled by target-space curvature. Worldsheet Weyl invariance therefore imposes equations on the target geometry.

A common pitfall is to identify this equation with the ordinary Einstein equation too quickly. The sigma-model beta function gives RmnR_{mn}, not directly Rmn12GmnRR_{mn}-{1\over2}G_{mn}R. The Einstein-like form appears after deriving the spacetime effective action and choosing the appropriate frame and dilaton variables.

In a first-quantized particle path integral, local insertions create or absorb external particles. In a string path integral, vertex operators play the same role.

For the simplest closed-string scalar mode, a plane-wave vertex has the schematic form

Vp=d2ξgeipX(ξ).V_p=\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\,e^{ip\cdot X(\xi)}.

For a graviton-like excitation one uses

Vϵ,p=d2ξϵmnXmˉXneipX.V_{\epsilon,p}=\int d^2\xi\, \epsilon_{mn}\partial X^m\bar\partial X^n e^{ip\cdot X}.

The condition that the integrated vertex operator be marginal is the worldsheet version of the spacetime mass-shell condition. For a free boson normalized by

Xm(z)Xn(0)=α2δmnlogz2,\langle X^m(z)X^n(0)\rangle=-{\alpha'\over2}\delta^{mn}\log|z|^2,

the operator eipXe^{ip\cdot X} has weights

h=hˉ=αpE24h=\bar h={\alpha'p_E^2\over4}

in Euclidean target signature. Under Wick rotation pE2=pL2p_E^2=-p_L^2, while the global (+---) convention gives pL2=m2p_L^2=m^2. The closed-string tachyon condition h=hˉ=1h=\bar h=1 therefore corresponds to

m2=4α.m^2=-{4\over\alpha'}.

Likewise, the operator

ϵmnXmˉXneipX\epsilon_{mn}\partial X^m\bar\partial X^n e^{ip\cdot X}

is marginal when pL2=0p_L^2=0 after continuation, with transverse and gauge-equivalence conditions on ϵmn\epsilon_{mn}. This gives the graviton, antisymmetric tensor, and dilaton in the closed-string spectrum.

Closed-string vertex operators on a sphere

Closed-string scattering amplitudes are worldsheet CFT correlators of vertex operators, integrated over insertion points and divided by conformal Killing transformations.

At tree level for closed strings, the worldsheet is a sphere. Fixing three punctures by the global conformal group leaves one complex modulus zz in a four-point amplitude. The amplitude contains integrals of the schematic form

A4d2zzαp1p21zαp2p3×(polarization factor).A_4\sim\int d^2z\,|z|^{\alpha'p_1\cdot p_2} |1-z|^{\alpha'p_2\cdot p_3}\times(\text{polarization factor}).

This one formula contains several earlier themes at once. The limits z0z\to0, z1z\to1, and zz\to\infty are OPE limits on the worldsheet. In spacetime, they become factorization channels of the scattering amplitude. The poles are the infinite tower of string states.

For an open string, the worldsheet has a boundary. An integrated physical boundary vertex must be a boundary primary of conformal weight one, so that its integral respects boundary reparametrization and Weyl invariance. The gauge-field vertex is

VA=ΣdsX˙μAμ(X),V_A=\int_{\partial\Sigma} ds\,\dot X^\mu A_\mu(X),

which for a plane wave Aμ(X)=ϵμeipXA_\mu(X)=\epsilon_\mu e^{ip\cdot X} becomes

Vϵ,p=dsϵμX˙μeipX(s).V_{\epsilon,p}=\int ds\,\epsilon_\mu\dot X^\mu e^{ip\cdot X(s)}.

This is the stringy descendant of the Wilson-line coupling AμdXμ\int A_\mu dX^\mu. The boundary of the worldsheet behaves like the worldline of a charged object.

Open-string boundary vertex operators

Open-string vertex operators live on the boundary. The massless vector vertex is the boundary Wilson-line coupling expanded in modes.

Excited boundary operators contain products of higher derivatives of XX and give an infinite tower of open-string states, including higher-spin states. A general matter operator has the schematic form

Vdsϵμ1μrj=1rsnjXμjeipX,nj1.V\sim\int ds\, \epsilon_{\mu_1\cdots\mu_r} \prod_{j=1}^{r}\partial_s^{n_j}X^{\mu_j} e^{ip\cdot X}, \qquad n_j\ge 1.

The precise basis is organized by the oscillator modes of the open string, but the physical idea is already visible: a string has internal vibration modes, and these appear as particles of increasing spin and mass.

There is also an important duality of interpretation. The same cylinder worldsheet can be sliced in two ways: as a loop of an open string, or as a closed string propagating between two boundaries.

Open-closed channel duality on the cylinder

A cylinder admits an open-string channel and a closed-string channel. This open–closed duality is the worldsheet origin of many gauge/string correspondences.

This is a good place to remember the earlier Wilson-loop discussion. A large Wilson loop can be represented by a string worldsheet ending on the loop. In an open-string channel, the boundary degrees of freedom look like charged particles and gauge fields. In a closed-string channel, the same diagram looks like exchange of closed-string modes, including the graviton and dilaton.

The notes now point toward a geometric idea that later became central in holography. Suppose the target-space metric has the warped form

ds2=dϕ2+a2(ϕ)dx2.ds^2=d\phi^2+a^2(\phi)d\vec x^{\,2}.

The coordinate ϕ\phi changes the proper length scale of the x\vec x directions. A local excitation with fixed proper mass is seen with a different coordinate energy at different values of ϕ\phi. Thus motion in the extra direction resembles motion in energy scale.

The most important special case is

ds2=dϕ2+e2ϕ/Rdx2.ds^2=d\phi^2+e^{2\phi/R}d\vec x^{\,2}.

With the dimensionful Poincaré coordinate

z=Reϕ/R,z=R e^{-\phi/R},

this becomes the Poincaré metric on Euclidean anti-de Sitter space:

ds2=R2dz2+dx2z2.ds^2=R^2{dz^2+d\vec x^{\,2}\over z^2}.

The transformation

xλx,ϕϕRlogλ\vec x\mapsto\lambda\vec x, \qquad \phi\mapsto\phi-R\log\lambda

leaves dϕ2+e2ϕ/Rdx2d\phi^2+e^{2\phi/R}d\vec x^{\,2} invariant. Equivalently,

xλx,zλz\vec x\mapsto\lambda\vec x, \qquad z\mapsto\lambda z

leaves R2(dz2+dx2)/z2R^2(dz^2+d\vec x^{\,2})/z^2 invariant. The conformal boundary lies at z0z\to0, or ϕ+\phi\to+\infty. This is the clean geometric reason the radial coordinate is tied to scale transformations.

Warped AdS geometry and the operator-vertex dictionary

In Poincaré AdS, boundary scale transformations are bulk isometries. A boundary operator insertion may be represented by a bulk field or string vertex operator whose radial profile records the RG scale.

The conformal group of flat dd-dimensional space is realized as the isometry group of AdSd+1AdS_{d+1}. Translations and rotations act on the boundary coordinates x\vec x. Dilatations act as the simultaneous scaling above. Special conformal transformations arise from AdS isometries that mix zz and x\vec x; equivalently, they are generated by inversion, translation, and inversion on the boundary.

This is the geometric hint behind the AdS/CFT correspondence. A conformal gauge theory, such as four-dimensional N=4\mathcal N=4 supersymmetric Yang–Mills with schematic Lagrangian

L=1gYM2Tr(FμνFμν+),\mathcal L={1\over g_{\rm YM}^2}\operatorname{Tr}\left(F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}+\cdots\right),

has local gauge-invariant operators

On(x)=Tr(F2(x)),Tr(FDF(x)),\mathcal O_n(x)=\operatorname{Tr}\bigl(F^2(x)\bigr),\quad \operatorname{Tr}\bigl(FD\cdots F(x)\bigr),\quad\ldots

A dual string or gravity description packages these operators into bulk fields or string vertex operators. In momentum space one writes schematically

Vn(p)=d2ξgΩn(Y(ξ))eipX(ξ),V_n(p)=\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\,\Omega_n(Y(\xi))e^{ip\cdot X(\xi)},

where Ωn\Omega_n is a wavefunction in the radial and internal directions. The bulk wave equation relates its mass to the scaling dimension of the boundary operator:

mn2R2=Δn(Δnd)m_n^2R^2=\Delta_n(\Delta_n-d)

for a scalar field in AdSd+1AdS_{d+1}.

The last page loops back to the first page of the course. The Ising model taught us that a statistical sum can be reorganized as a sum over loops or domain walls. Kramers–Wannier duality taught us that nonlocal variables may be the right local variables in the dual description. The continuum limit taught us that criticality produces fields. The CFT pages taught us that two-dimensional scale invariance, stress tensors, and anomalies are powerful enough to determine spectra and correlators. The gauge-theory pages taught us that Wilson loops diagnose confinement and that compactness creates topological defects. The string pages reinterpret those Wilson-loop surfaces as dynamical worldsheets.

So the conceptual chain is

spinsloops and defectsfields and CFTflux-tube worldsheetsstrings and geometry.\text{spins} \longrightarrow \text{loops and defects} \longrightarrow \text{fields and CFT} \longrightarrow \text{flux-tube worldsheets} \longrightarrow \text{strings and geometry}.

The punchline is not that every QFT is secretly a simple string theory. The punchline is sharper: whenever a QFT admits a useful description in terms of fluctuating extended objects, the tools developed in this course—duality, RG, conformal invariance, anomalies, and gauge-invariant observables—are the natural language for finding it.

Exercise 1: Eliminating the worldsheet metric

Section titled “Exercise 1: Eliminating the worldsheet metric”

Start from the Euclidean Polyakov action

SP=Ts2d2ξggabhab,hab=aXbX.S_P={T_s\over2}\int d^2\xi\sqrt g\,g^{ab}h_{ab}, \qquad h_{ab}=\partial_aX\cdot\partial_bX.

Assume the induced metric habh_{ab} is nondegenerate. Show that varying with respect to gabg^{ab} implies that gabg_{ab} is proportional to habh_{ab}, and that substituting this result gives the Nambu–Goto action

SNG=Tsd2ξdeth.S_{NG}=T_s\int d^2\xi\sqrt{\det h}.
Solution

The variation is

δSP=Ts2d2ξg(hab12gabgcdhcd)δgab.\delta S_P={T_s\over2}\int d^2\xi\sqrt g \left(h_{ab}-{1\over2}g_{ab}g^{cd}h_{cd}\right)\delta g^{ab}.

Thus

hab12gabgcdhcd=0.h_{ab}-{1\over2}g_{ab}g^{cd}h_{cd}=0.

This equation says that habh_{ab} is proportional to gabg_{ab}:

hab=λgab,λ=12gcdhcd.h_{ab}=\lambda g_{ab}, \qquad \lambda={1\over2}g^{cd}h_{cd}.

In two dimensions the proportionality factor is not fixed because of Weyl invariance. Choose the Weyl gauge gab=habg_{ab}=h_{ab}. Then

ggabhab=hhabhab=2h,\sqrt g\,g^{ab}h_{ab}=\sqrt h\,h^{ab}h_{ab}=2\sqrt h,

so

SP=Ts22h=Tsd2ξdeth.S_P={T_s\over2}\int 2\sqrt h=T_s\int d^2\xi\sqrt{\det h}.

This is the Nambu–Goto action.

Exercise 2: Entropy renormalizes the string tension

Section titled “Exercise 2: Entropy renormalizes the string tension”

Assume that the number of lattice surfaces of area AA bounded by a large loop behaves as N(A)es0AN(A)\sim e^{s_0A}. If each surface has bare Boltzmann weight eT0Ae^{-T_0A}, find the effective tension and state the condition for large surfaces to proliferate.

Solution

The contribution of surfaces with area AA is approximately

N(A)eT0Aes0AeT0A=e(T0s0)A.N(A)e^{-T_0A}\sim e^{s_0A}e^{-T_0A}=e^{-(T_0-s_0)A}.

Thus

Teff=T0s0.T_{\rm eff}=T_0-s_0.

If Teff>0T_{\rm eff}>0, large surfaces are exponentially suppressed. If Teff0+T_{\rm eff}\to0^+, large surfaces are no longer strongly suppressed, and a continuum fluctuating-surface description can emerge. If Teff<0T_{\rm eff}<0, the naive surface sum is unstable and must be regulated by additional physics.

Exercise 3: The O(N) sigma-model correlation length

Section titled “Exercise 3: The O(N) sigma-model correlation length”

Let

dαdlog=N22πα2{d\alpha\over d\log\ell}={N-2\over2\pi}\alpha^2

for the two-dimensional O(N)O(N) sigma model with N>2N>2. Solve for α()\alpha(\ell) in terms of α0=α(0)\alpha_0=\alpha(\ell_0) and estimate the scale ξ\xi at which perturbation theory breaks down.

Solution

Separate variables:

dαα2=N22πdlog.{d\alpha\over\alpha^2}={N-2\over2\pi}d\log\ell.

Integrating from 0\ell_0 to \ell gives

1α()+1α0=N22πlog0.-{1\over\alpha(\ell)}+{1\over\alpha_0} ={N-2\over2\pi}\log{\ell\over\ell_0}.

Therefore

α()=α01N22πα0log(/0).\alpha(\ell)= {\alpha_0\over1-{N-2\over2\pi}\alpha_0\log(\ell/\ell_0)}.

The denominator vanishes at

ξ0exp(2π(N2)α0).\xi\sim \ell_0\exp\left({2\pi\over(N-2)\alpha_0}\right).

This is the dynamically generated long-distance scale. In energy variables μ=1/\mu=1/\ell, the coupling decreases logarithmically in the ultraviolet.

Exercise 4: Marginality of the closed-string tachyon vertex

Section titled “Exercise 4: Marginality of the closed-string tachyon vertex”

For a free boson with

Xm(z)Xn(0)=α2δmnlogz2,\langle X^m(z)X^n(0)\rangle=-{\alpha'\over2}\delta^{mn}\log|z|^2,

the operator eipXe^{ip\cdot X} has weights

h=hˉ=αpE24.h=\bar h={\alpha'p_E^2\over4}.

Find the condition for the integrated closed-string vertex

Vp=d2zeipX(z,zˉ)V_p=\int d^2z\,e^{ip\cdot X(z,\bar z)}

to be marginal, and translate it into the Lorentzian mass of the state.

Solution

The measure d2zd^2z has weights (1,1)(-1,-1), so the integrand must have weights (1,1)(1,1) for the integrated operator to be invariant. Therefore

h=hˉ=1.h=\bar h=1.

Using h=hˉ=αpE2/4h=\bar h=\alpha'p_E^2/4 gives

pE2=4αp_E^2={4\over\alpha'}

in Euclidean target signature. Wick rotation gives pE2=pL2p_E^2=-p_L^2, and the global (+---) convention identifies pL2=m2p_L^2=m^2. Therefore the corresponding state has

m2=4α.m^2=-{4\over\alpha'}.

This is the closed bosonic string tachyon.

Show that

ds2=R2dz2+dx2z2ds^2=R^2{dz^2+d\vec x^{\,2}\over z^2}

is invariant under

zλz,xλx.z\mapsto\lambda z, \qquad \vec x\mapsto\lambda\vec x.

Then rewrite the metric using z=Reϕ/Rz=R e^{-\phi/R}.

Solution

Under the scaling,

dzλdz,dxλdx,z2λ2z2.dz\mapsto\lambda dz, \qquad d\vec x\mapsto\lambda d\vec x, \qquad z^2\mapsto\lambda^2z^2.

Thus

dz2+dx2z2λ2(dz2+dx2)λ2z2=dz2+dx2z2.{dz^2+d\vec x^{\,2}\over z^2} \mapsto {\lambda^2(dz^2+d\vec x^{\,2})\over\lambda^2z^2} ={dz^2+d\vec x^{\,2}\over z^2}.

Now set z=Reϕ/Rz=R e^{-\phi/R}. Then

dzz=dϕR,R2dz2z2=dϕ2,{dz\over z}=-{d\phi\over R}, \qquad R^2{dz^2\over z^2}=d\phi^2,

and

R2dx2z2=e2ϕ/Rdx2.R^2{d\vec x^{\,2}\over z^2}=e^{2\phi/R}d\vec x^{\,2}.

Therefore

ds2=dϕ2+e2ϕ/Rdx2.ds^2=d\phi^2+e^{2\phi/R}d\vec x^{\,2}.

A rescaling of the boundary coordinates is compensated by a shift of ϕ\phi.

Exercise 6: Bulk scalar mass and boundary dimension

Section titled “Exercise 6: Bulk scalar mass and boundary dimension”

For a scalar field in AdSd+1AdS_{d+1}, the near-boundary relation between the bulk mass and the scaling dimension is

m2R2=Δ(Δd).m^2R^2=\Delta(\Delta-d).

Solve for Δ\Delta and state which branch is usually chosen for standard quantization.

Solution

The quadratic equation is

Δ2dΔm2R2=0.\Delta^2-d\Delta-m^2R^2=0.

Thus

Δ±=d2±d24+m2R2.\Delta_\pm={d\over2}\pm\sqrt{{d^2\over4}+m^2R^2}.

In standard quantization one usually chooses

Δ=Δ+=d2+d24+m2R2.\Delta=\Delta_+={d\over2}+\sqrt{{d^2\over4}+m^2R^2}.

The roots are real above the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound m2R2d2/4m^2R^2\ge-d^2/4. In the window

d24<m2R2<d24+1,-{d^2\over4}<m^2R^2<-{d^2\over4}+1,

both falloffs are normalizable and alternate quantization with Δ=Δ\Delta=\Delta_- may be possible; standard quantization uses the larger root Δ+\Delta_+.

  • P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory (Springer-Verlag, 1997), chapters on free bosons, vertex operators, Virasoro symmetry, and worldsheet CFT.
  • M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory, vols. 1–2 (Cambridge University Press, 1987).
  • S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Physics Letters B 428 (1998), 105–114.
  • J. M. Maldacena, “The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2 (1998), 231–252.
  • J. Polchinski, String Theory, vols. 1–2 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  • A. M. Polyakov, Gauge Fields and Strings, Contemporary Concepts in Physics, vol. 3 (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987), Chapters 9–10.
  • E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2 (1998), 253–291.
  • J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, 2002), chapters on nonlinear sigma models and renormalization-group flow.