Skip to content

de Sitter Infrared Physics and Stochastic Inflation

de Sitter infrared statements are meaningful only after the patch, state, field algebra, observable, gauge, regulator, order of limits, and duration are fixed. Stochastic inflation is a controlled leading-long-wavelength description in specified scalar regimes; it is not a universal replacement for in-in QFT, a solution of the gravitational observable problem, or an exact equilibrium description of finite slow roll.

Helpful background. Langevin fields and noise supplies stochastic normalization; influence functionals supplies reduced dynamics; cosmological loops and secular growth supplies in-in power counting; and Bunch–Davies and alpha-state diagnostics supplies the free-state distinction.

Infrared and stochastic control parameters

Section titled “Infrared and stochastic control parameters”

In the spatially flat patch,

ds2=dt2e2Htdx2=a2(η)(dη2dx2),a=1Hη.ds^2=dt^2-e^{2Ht}d\mathbf x^2 =a^2(\eta)(d\eta^2-d\mathbf x^2), \qquad a=-\frac1{H\eta}.

With the site’s curvature convention Rsite=12H2R_{\rm site}=-12H^2, a scalar governed by P=+m2+ξRP=\Box+m^2+\xi R has

M2=m212ξH2,ν2=94M2H2.M^2=m^2-12\xi H^2, \qquad \nu^2=\frac94-\frac{M^2}{H^2}.

The standard massive Euclidean/Bunch–Davies state is distinct from the M2=0M^2=0 minimally coupled zero-mode problem. For 0<M2H20<M^2\ll H^2, the long-field relaxation time scales as H2/M2H^2/M^2 e-folds; taking M0M\to0 before or after that time gives different answers. Allen’s state classification and zero-mode analysis make this scope distinction explicit Allen 1985, §§II–IV, pp. 3138–3147.

For a light spectator with fixed HH, the leading sharp-window stochastic equation in cosmic time is

dϕL=V(ϕL)3Hdt+H3/22πdWt,E[dWt2]=dt.d\phi_L=-\frac{V'(\phi_L)}{3H}\,dt +\frac{H^{3/2}}{2\pi}\,dW_t, \qquad \mathbb E[dW_t^2]=dt.

Equivalently, with ζ(t)ζ(t)=H3δ(tt)/(4π2)\langle\zeta(t)\zeta(t')\rangle=H^3\delta(t-t')/(4\pi^2),

tP=13Hϕ(VP)+H38π2ϕ2P.\partial_t P =\frac1{3H}\partial_\phi(V'P) +\frac{H^3}{8\pi^2}\partial_\phi^2P.

The coefficient is tied to a specified state and moving coarse-graining window. Smooth windows generate finite correlation time and calculable matching corrections. Under fixed HH, zero probability current, no volume weighting, and normalizability, the stationary solution is

Peq(ϕ)=Nexp ⁣[8π2V(ϕ)3H4].P_{\rm eq}(\phi)=\mathcal N \exp\!\left[-\frac{8\pi^2V(\phi)}{3H^4}\right].

These formulas were established for light scalar long modes and their leading infrared dynamics Starobinsky and Yokoyama 1994, §§II–III, Eqs. (2.1)–(3.7). Every extension in this chapter states which assumptions survive.

For a light quartic scalar, the diagrammatic correspondence with in-in QFT is established at leading infrared order, not for every gradient or unequal-time observable Garbrecht et al. 2015, §§III–V, Eqs. (35)–(75).

The structure map separates free-state and zero-mode questions from interacting resummation, scalar coarse-graining, open-system corrections, first passage, and gravitational observables.

de Sitter patch and state data branch into scalar infrared limits, relational graviton observables, resummation, stochastic dynamics, and QFT matching

Free-field state selection, zero modes, interacting logarithms, resummation, stochastic coarse-graining, open-system dynamics, and relational gravity are distinct calculations with different control parameters. Schematic; not to scale.

  1. de Sitter infrared regimes fixes patches, observables, regulators, and limit order.
  2. Euclidean and Bunch–Davies free fields derives the standard massive scalar state.
  3. Massless zero modes isolates the minimally coupled obstruction and restricted observables.
  4. Interacting infrared logs identifies perturbative nonuniformity by object and symmetry.
  5. Graviton infrared claims tests coordinate correlators against relational observables.
  6. Infrared resummation compares large-N, stochastic, and diagrammatic mass scales.
  7. Stochastic coarse-graining derives drift and noise from a moving split.
  8. Langevin and Fokker–Planck dynamics fixes calculus, measure, moments, and normalization.
  9. Open-system noise and dissipation restores colored noise, memory, and influence kernels.
  10. Stationary and first-passage observables imposes current and boundary conditions.
  11. QFT–stochastic matching states the renormalized observable subset that agrees.
  12. Quasi-de Sitter validity separates slow-variation, finite-duration, and evidence errors.

This is the canonical comparison table for the chapter. Its evidence status is current through 10 August 2026 where a dispute is consequential.

ProblemPatch, state, and objectRegulator or splitControlled outputDecisive checkFailure or handoff
Infrared classificationDeclared patch, state, field or local compositeMass, volume, or invariant prescriptionLimit-specific correlatorExchange limit orderNoncommuting limits forbid a universal statement
Massive free fieldEuclidean/BD state, M2>0M^2>0Euclidean continuation and i0i0Hadamard Wightman functionCanonical jump and coincidence formDoes not cover the minimal massless zero mode
Minimal zero modeGlobal mode algebra or shift-invariant subalgebraSmall mass and finite volume kept distinctDerivative or difference observablesRegulator agreement on the same algebraNo standard invariant Fock vacuum for ϕ\phi
Interacting logsSpecified in-in observable and interactionUV subtraction plus declared IR regulatorFixed-order secular intervalCompare λNp\lambda N^p with unityA large log signals nonuniform perturbation, not automatically instability
Graviton infraredGauge, dressing, finite operational regionResidual-gauge and smearing prescriptionRelational or curvature observableGauge/dressing comparisonCoordinate two-point growth alone is insufficient
Resummed scalarCoupling, NN, mass, equal- or unequal-time objectLarge-N, 2PI, stochastic, or RG schemeMethod-specific infrared scaleTranslate conventions and observablesEqual-time agreement does not prove universal dynamics
Coarse-grained scalarBD-like short modes and window W(k/kc)W(k/k_c)kc=ϵaHk_c=\epsilon aH with hierarchyLeading drift and noiseWindow variation after matchingWhite noise is not exact for a smooth split
Fokker–Planck evolutionField coordinate, measure, Itô/Stratonovich choiceTime step and field gridNormalized moments or densityDrift conversion and ensemble agreementConvention-dependent density is rejected
Open-system correctionDeclared system/environment and initial stateInfluence kernels and correlation timeNoise, dissipation, memoryMarkov hierarchy and covariance positivityKMS fluctuation–dissipation is not generic
Stationary or first passageFixed HH, normalizable current condition, boundariesAbsorbing/reflecting domainEquilibrium density or hitting distributionRelaxation and boundary variationNo volume-weighted eternal-inflation measure claim
QFT matchingSame renormalized in-in observable and orderUV scheme plus stochastic matching scaleLeading-IR equality for a stated subsetUnequal-time and gradient testsOne variance does not establish full-theory equivalence
Quasi-de Sitter transportH(t)H(t), slow parameters, state, durationLocal window and time-dependent matchingFinite-time prediction with two errorsVary duration and formalismExact-de Sitter equilibrium may never be reached

The validity map emphasizes wrong-order limits, gauge-dependent graviton claims, unjustified white-noise or stationary approximations, and overextended QFT–stochastic equivalence.

Interchanged infrared limits, gauge-dependent graviton growth, unjustified Markov equilibrium, or overextended stochastic matching block a de Sitter conclusion

Each infrared or stochastic result is licensed only for its declared observable, limit order, coarse-graining hierarchy, and evidence class. Schematic; not to scale.

  • Allen, B., “Vacuum States in de Sitter Space,” Physical Review D 32, 3136–3149 (1985), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.3136.
  • Garbrecht, B., F. Gautier, G. Rigopoulos, and Y. Zhu, “Feynman Diagrams for Stochastic Inflation and Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space,” Physical Review D 91, 063520 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.063520.
  • Starobinsky, A. A., and J. Yokoyama, “Equilibrium State of a Self-Interacting Scalar Field in the de Sitter Background,” Physical Review D 50, 6357–6368 (1994), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.6357.