Inflationary Correlators and Cosmological Perturbation Theory
Inflationary correlation functions are predictions only after the dynamical clock, gravitational constraints, canonical variables, initial density matrix, time contour, effective-field-theory hierarchy, and late-time observable have been specified. This chapter builds that chain from the background solution to power spectra, bispectra, loops, resummation, and reduced quantum states. It also marks where familiar shortcuts—horizon-crossing evaluation, decoupling, a squeezed-limit identity, or a claim of classicality—cease to be controlled.
Helpful background. Closed-time-path generating functionals supplies normalized real-time evolution; effective field theory as a controlled expansion supplies power counting; vacuum choice and initial-state effects supplies state diagnostics; and momentum-space conformal Ward identities supplies the symmetry language used in soft limits.
From a clock background to a correlator
Section titled “From a clock background to a correlator”For a canonical single field, a useful reference theory in the site’s conventions is
On a spatially flat FLRW solution, , define
The evolving scalar background selects a clock and spontaneously breaks time reparameterizations while preserving time-dependent spatial diffeomorphisms. Lapse and shift remain constraints. Solving them produces one scalar adiabatic mode and two tensor helicities in the minimal model; additional fields, higher derivatives, or modified gravity change that inventory.
Our scalar sign is fixed by writing the spatial metric in comoving gauge as
Thus the curvature perturbation used throughout this chapter is ; when appears, it means . In the Goldstone description below, the Stückelberg field is defined by restoring the clock as , so at linear order. These declarations prevent the two common sign translations from being hidden in otherwise identical formulas.
The structure map shows that a correlator is assembled through a sequence of reductions, each with a separate check.
Background evolution, constraint solving, state preparation, in-in evolution, EFT power counting, and observable extraction are successive inputs to an inflationary correlator. Schematic; not to scale.
Routes through the chapter
Section titled “Routes through the chapter”- Background symmetry breaking and decoupling identifies the clock, constraints, mixing scale, and cutoff.
- Gauge-invariant perturbations constructs scalar, vector, and tensor representatives.
- Mukhanov–Sasaki modes reduces the scalar sector to its canonical oscillator.
- Tensor modes fixes helicity and normalization conventions.
- Constraint solving and the observable dictionary follows a calculation from ADM variables to a late-time quantity.
- Power spectra and freeze-out distinguishes a crossing estimate from conserved evolution.
- In-in correlators derives normalized expectation values on a closed time path.
- Contours and initial boundaries treats , finite initial time, and boundary vertices.
- The EFT of inflation organizes Goldstone interactions and strong-coupling scales.
- Cubic interactions and bispectra relates operators to shapes and boundary terms.
- Soft limits states the hypotheses behind consistency relations.
- Cosmological loops separates ultraviolet renormalization from infrared and secular effects.
- Secular resummation identifies observable-specific large-log expansions.
- Decoherence distinguishes squeezing, reduced-state diagonality, and measurement claims.
Domain and failure conditions
Section titled “Domain and failure conditions”This table is the chapter’s canonical comparison of controlled claims and their failure tests.
| Problem | Required data | Controlled output | Expansion parameter or check | Failure or handoff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background and decoupling | Clock solution, constraint equations, EFT coefficients | Goldstone–gravity hierarchy | Compare mixing energy, freeze-out scale, and cutoff | Solve the coupled constrained system when scales overlap |
| Gauge-invariant variables | Transformation convention and boundary conditions | Gauge-invariant scalar and tensor representatives | Recompute in a second complete gauge | Residual or large transformations require relational data |
| Scalar modes | , sound speed, state | Canonically normalized | Wronskian and long-mode solution | Entropy sources or rapid variation require a larger system |
| Tensor modes | Effective Planck mass, tensor speed, polarization norm | Two-helicity spectrum | Canonical commutator and both-helicity count | Higher-curvature modes require EFT or new degrees of freedom |
| Constraint reduction | Lapse, shift, boundary terms, target observable | Reduced action and observable map | Agreement between two gauges | A gauge-coordinate correlator is not automatically observable |
| Power spectra | State and background evolution through freeze-out | Late-time scalar or tensor spectrum | Compare exact transport with crossing estimate | Nonattractor evolution invalidates freeze-out shorthand |
| In-in evolution | Density matrix, contour, interaction Hamiltonian | Normalized real-time expectation value | , reality, largest-time check | In-out amplitudes do not replace expectation values |
| Initial boundary | Initial surface, , boundary action | State-dependent correlator | Move the surface while running boundary coefficients | Unmatched surface dependence signals an incomplete state EFT |
| Goldstone EFT | Unitary-gauge operators and cutoff hierarchy | Ordered interactions | Energy and coefficient power counting | Strong coupling before freeze-out ends predictivity |
| Bispectrum | Cubic action, field map, state | Shape and normalization | Integration-by-parts and field-redefinition invariance | A shape label alone does not identify a model |
| Soft limit | Single clock, attractor, invariant state, locality | Ward identity for a soft leg | Direct squeezed calculation | Excited states, entropy modes, or nonattractors modify it |
| Loop correction | Regulator, counterterms, composite observable, state | Renormalized correlator | Independent UV and IR variations | UV poles and infrared logs must not be conflated |
| Secular resummation | Observable and identified large parameter | Method-specific late-time approximation | Re-expand to fixed order | Resummation of one object need not control another |
| Decoherence | System split, environment, window, coupling | Reduced density matrix or influence functional | Split variation after matching and positivity | Diagonality neither selects an outcome nor proves classical gravity |
The validity map collects the most consequential ways this chain can fail. Inspect where the proposed approximation is compared with the physical scale at which the correlator is evaluated.
An inflationary correlator is controlled only when constraints, gauge completion, initial data, contour normalization, EFT hierarchy, renormalization, and observable scope all pass their own checks. Schematic; not to scale.
References
Section titled “References”- Cheung, C., P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,” Journal of High Energy Physics 03, 014 (2008), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/014.
- Maldacena, J., “Non-Gaussian Features of Primordial Fluctuations in Single Field Inflationary Models,” Journal of High Energy Physics 05, 013 (2003), doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/013.
- Mukhanov, V. F., H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Theory of Cosmological Perturbations,” Physics Reports 215, 203–333 (1992), doi:10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z.
- Weinberg, S., “Quantum Contributions to Cosmological Correlations,” Physical Review D 72, 043514 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043514.